RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if gemcitabine is more effective when given alone or in combination with another chemotherapy drug in treating cancer of the pancreas. PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine given alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs in treating patients who have metastatic cancer of the pancreas.
OBJECTIVES: * Compare the overall survival rate of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine alone vs with cisplatin vs with docetaxel vs with irinotecan. * Compare the time to disease progression in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the CA 19-9 biomarker response in patients treated with these regimens. * Correlate the CA 19-9 biomarker response with survival in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients. * Compare the response in patients with measurable disease treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to one of four treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by cisplatin IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for at least 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 150 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for at least 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes followed by docetaxel IV over 60 minutes on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for at least 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm IV: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes followed by irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for at least 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 3 years. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 240 patients (60 per arm) will be accrued for this study within 30 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
259
50 mg/sq m IV infusion over 30 min on Days 1 \& 15 of ea cycle
40 mg/sq m IV infusion over 60 min on Days 1 \& 8 of ea treatment cycle
Gemcitabine only arm: 1500 mg/sq m in 250 mL NS IV infusion over 150 min Days 1, 8, \& 15 of ea cycle * cisplastin arm: 1000 mg/sq m 250 mL NS IV infusion over 30 min Days 1, 8, 15 of ea cycle * docetaxel and + irinotecan arms: 1000 mg/sq m in 250 mL NS IV infusion over 30 min Days 1 \& 8 of ea cycle
100 mg/q m in 500 mL D5W or D5NS IV infusion over 90 min Days 1 \& 8 of ea cycle
Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Overall Survival
Time frame: 4 years post treatment
Time to disease progression
Time frame: treatment up to 4 years post treatment
Toxicity
Time frame: treatment and up to 4 years post treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, United States
Lombardi Cancer Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Washington, DC
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Broward General Medical Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
...and 66 more locations