People with poor literacy may have worse health and less knowledge about how to manage their disease than patients at high reading levels. Patients with arthritis usually receive information on how to manage their disease that is written at an 11th grade reading level. The purpose of this study is to compare the health outcomes of patients with arthritis given either standard 11th grade level materials or interactive, in-person arthritis education along with materials written at a lower reading level.
Patients with poor literacy report worse health and know less about managing their disease than patients with better literacy. This study will compare the disease outcomes of arthritis patients at three different reading levels who receive either standard arthritis materials written at an 11th grade reading level or an in-person, interactive, text-free session along with lower reading level materials. The study will determine the most effective methods of educating patients with poor literacy about their disease. Patients with systemic inflammatory rheumatic conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and seronegative polyarthritis) will be assessed and placed into one of three reading levels: 8th grade or lower; 9th to 11th grade; or 12th grade or higher. Patients from each reading level will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. Group 1 will receive disease-specific material from the Arthritis Foundation written at an 11th grade reading level. Group 2 will receive plain language materials, an arthritis glossary, and a one-hour, in-person session with a study educator using interactive, text-free methods. The study educator will help the patient with reading-related problems either by study visit or by telephone for 6 months postsession. All patients will receive a medication calendar. Patients will be followed for one year after the intervention and will be assessed for changes in health status, disease activity, communication with the physician, self-management of their arthritis, understanding of and adherence to prescribed treatment, and satisfaction with their intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
134
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Adherence to treatment
self report of medication use on standard form
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
Self efficacy
self report on self efficacy form
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Satisfaction with medical care
self report of satisfaction
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Heath Status
Health Assessment questionaire
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Mental Health
SF-36 (5 items)
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Understanding of medication
open ended questionnaire of medication purpose
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Perceived usefulness of materials
Interview
Time frame: 6months and 12 months
Appointment keeping
Clinical record
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.