RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy such as fluorouracil and mitomycin use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Fluorouracil and mitomycin may make the tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. It is not yet known if radiation therapy is more effective with or without chemotherapy in treating bladder cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy to all or part of the bladder with or without chemotherapy in treating patients who have stage II or stage III bladder cancer.
OBJECTIVES: * Compare the efficacy of standard volume radiotherapy vs reduced volume radiotherapy with or without synchronous fluorouracil and mitomycin in patients with stage II or III (muscle invasive) bladder cancer. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs no), and intent to enter only 1 of the possible 2 randomizations on study (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo standard radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 4 or 6.5 weeks. Patients also receive synchronous chemotherapy comprising mitomycin IV on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously over days 1-5 and 16-20 during radiotherapy. * Arm II: Patients undergo standard radiotherapy as in arm I (without chemotherapy). If standard radiotherapy is clearly indicated (e.g., patients with multiple tumors) patients may be randomized to standard radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (arms I or III above). If chemotherapy is clearly contraindicated, patients are randomized to standard or reduced volume radiotherapy without chemotherapy (arms III or IV above). Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at the end of therapy, at 6 and 12 months post-randomization, and then annually for at least 5 years. Patients are followed at 6, 9, and 12 months post-randomization and then at least annually thereafter. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 350 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
350
Royal United Hospital
Bath, England, United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital at University Hospital of Birmingham NHS Trust
Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
Royal Bournemouth Hospital NHS Trust
Bournemouth, England, United Kingdom
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, England, United Kingdom
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Loco-regional disease free survival at 2 years
Disease-free survival, metastases-free survival, and late toxicity by RTOG and Lent Som toxicity scores, Bladder capacity, and patient assessed Fact-BL quality of life scores at 1 and 2 years
Acute toxicity and cystoscopic local control at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Rate of salvage cystectomy
Overall survival
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
Essex County Hospital
Colchester, England, United Kingdom
Walsgrave Hospital
Coventry, England, United Kingdom
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
Derby, England, United Kingdom
...and 17 more locations