The purpose of this study is to determine if subjects with symptomatic asthma who are assigned to treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drug such as Nexium have fewer asthma attacks than similar subjects assigned to placebo treatment.
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is frequent in asthmatics with poor asthma control, often occurs without symptoms, and can induce bronchoconstriction. Poorly controlled asthmatics are often treated for GERD with drugs that suppress gastric acid, but this treatment is expensive and the benefit of such treatment is not established. Proton pump inhibitors are a relatively new class of medications that provide highly effective treatment for GERD and associated problems. This success has led many doctors to begin PPI treatment in their asthma patients in an attempt to achieve better asthma control. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The randomized, placebo-controlled trial will enroll 400 asthmatics, ages 18 or older, who have poor asthma control on inhaled steroids, defined on the basis of excessive bronchodilator use, nocturnal awakenings, or frequent exacerbations. Participants will be randomly assigned to treatment with either a proton pump inhibitor, esomeprazole (Nexium) 40 mg twice a day, or matching placebo. The presence, severity, and temporal relationship of GERD to asthma symptoms will be documented with 24 hour ambulatory esophageal potential Hydrogen (pH) probe monitoring, but participants will be enrolled irrespective of the severity of GERD. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of participants who have exacerbations of asthma within a 6-month period defined by asthma diaries and interviews. Secondary outcome measures include asthma symptom and control scores, asthma-specific and generic health-related quality of life, GERD symptoms, health care use, pulmonary function, and airways reactivity. Pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted to determine if there are clinical or demographic characteristics that predict benefit from treatment of GERD in asthma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
403
Proton pump inhibitor 40 mg orally twice daily
Placebo proton pump inhibitor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of California, San Diego
Episodes of Poor Asthma Control (EPAC) From Diary Cards, According to Definition That Did Not Include Use of Beta-agonists as a Criterion
Episodes of poor asthma control was defined as any one of the following: 2 consecutive days with a drop in peak flow \>=30% of baseline; urgent care for asthma; or new use of oral corticosteroids for asthma
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Exacerbation Components: >=30% Drop in Peak Expiratory Flow on 2 Consecutive Days
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Exacerbation Components: Urgent Care Visit
Time frame: Measured at Month 6
Exacerbation Components: New Use of Oral Corticosteroids
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Asthma Episodes, According to Definition That Included Increased Use of Beta-agonists
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Use of Rescue Medications
Increase in the use of rescue meds by 4 or more uses on a particular day above the average uses during the run-in period.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Night Awakening
Rate of awakening at night because of asthma symptoms
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator FEV1
Mean change in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 - forced expiratory volume in 1 second; a measure of pulmonary function. The treatment effect is the difference in the mean change in between the groups.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
San Diego, California, United States
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Nemours Childrens Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Indiana University ACRC
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
LSUHSC Pulmonary Critical Care
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
...and 10 more locations
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity
Pulmonary function measured by mean change in Prebronchodilator forced vital capacity from baseline to 24 weeks
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Peak Flow Rate
Mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in the peak flow rate - how forceful patient can blow out air
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in PC20
Mean Change in the dose of methacholine that results in a 20% drop in FEV1
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Juniper Asthma Control Score(JACQ)
Mean change. Scores on the JACQ range from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better asthma control and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)
Mean change. Scores on the ASUI range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating less severe asthma.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ)
Mean change. Scores on the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ)range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Score Quality of Life Score: Physical Component
Mean change. Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Quality of Life Score: Mental Component
Mean change. Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Gastric Symptoms: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale Score
Mean change. The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale score ranges from 0 to 3, with lower numbers indicating less distress.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Number of Gastric Symptoms: No. of Symptoms
Mean change
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks