This study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two dose schedules of an oral investigational drug for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
131
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Tumor Response in the Targeted Population Through the End of Treatment
Disease progression and tumor response (number of participants achieving a complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]), using standardized criteria (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors). CR, disappearance of all target lesions; PR, 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; progressive disease, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease, small changes that do not meet above criteria. Disease assessment was done at baseline and then every 8 weeks after starting treatment, until the participant discontinued treatment.
Time frame: Baseline and then every 8 weeks through end of treatment
Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Four Months in the Targeted Population
Percentage of participants in the Targeted Population, at 4 months after starting study drug, who were alive and without disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization and then every 8 weeks up to four months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Four Months in the Non-Targeted Population
Percentage of participants in the Non-Targeted Population, at 4 months after starting study drug, who were alive and without disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization and then every 8 weeks up to four months
The Number of Participants Who Showed Certain Biomarkers in Their Serum or Tumor Tissue
To further characterize the participant population, these biomarkers could be tested: serum levels of ErbB1 and ErbB2; intra-tumoral expression of ErbB1, ErbB2, etc.; mutations in ErbB1, ErbB2, and k-ras. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, serum biomarkers were not analyzed.
Time frame: From randomization to disease progression (for serum biomarkers) or until analyses of tumor tissue samples
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Jasper, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Greenbrae, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
La Jolla, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Poway, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Rancho Mirage, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Gainsville, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houma, Louisiana, United States
...and 21 more locations
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Lapatinib
To characterize the PK (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) of the study drug lapatinib in the participant population. PK is defined as the concentration of drug in a participant's blood at certain time points after the drug was taken by mouth. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, pharmacokinetics were not analyzed.
Time frame: From randomization to time of PK period completed: Day 1 (first dose) and Days 2, 28, and 29 while participant was on study drug
Pharmacogenetics (PgX)
To (1) investigate the relationship between genetic variants in specific genes and the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (pharmacokinetics) of lapatinib, and to (2) investigate the relationship between genetic variants in select genes in DNA and the response (safety, efficacy, and tolerability) to lapatinib. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, pharmacogenetics were not analyzed.
Time frame: From randomization at every 4-week assessment through end of treatment
Quality of Life
Standard survey forms were completed by the participant at scheduled assessments to find out how the participant felt while on study. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, quality of life was not analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline and then every 4 weeks through end of treatment
Time to Response
Time from randomization until first documented evidence of partial or complete tumor response, measured using standard criteria (RECIST). Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, time to response was not analyzed.
Time frame: From randomization and then every 8 weeks to time of response to study drug
Duration of Response
For those participants who show a complete or partial response, duration of response would be time from first documented evidence of response (complete or partial response by RECIST) until disease progression or death, if sooner. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, duration of response was not analyzed.
Time frame: Time from first documented evidence of response to study treatment and then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death
Time to Tumor Progression
Time from randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, time to tumor progression was not analyzed.
Time frame: From randomization and then every 8 weeks to disease progression or death
Overall Survival
Overall survival is measured as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, overall survival was not analyzed.
Time frame: From randomization and then every 8 weeks while on study drug and then every 3 months as follow-up until death
Review of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Histology (Cell Type) Using an Independent Review
Comparison of the specific cell type (histology) of non-small cell lung cancer from participant's tissue samples, as determined by local pathologist, to the type determined by an independent pathologist. Based on the interim analysis at the end of Stage 1, and predefined stopping rules for futility, further enrollment into the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy on both treatment arms; therefore, NSCLC histology was not analyzed.
Time frame: Anytime from Baseline through end of study