This 4 arm study is designed for patients with CHC who have not responded to peginterferon alfa-2b (12KD)/ribavirin combination therapy. In these patients, the effects of lengthening the duration of treatment, as well as including an initial 12-week period of high-dose PEGASYS (360 micrograms sc), are compared with the standard combination therapy of PEGASYS (180 micrograms sc) and ribavirin (1000-1200mg po). The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
948
1000/1200mg po daily for 72 weeks
1000/1200mg po daily for 48 weeks
360 micrograms sc weekly for 12 weeks, followed by 180 micrograms sc weekly for 60 weeks
360 micrograms sc weekly for 12 weeks, followed by 180 micrograms sc weekly for 36 weeks.
180 micrograms sc weekly for 72 weeks
180 micrograms sc weekly for 48 weeks
Unnamed facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Pasadena, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response Rate
Sustained Virological Response (SVR) was defined as the percentage of participants with a undetectable hepatitis C virus- ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) 24 weeks after the end of the treatment period (defined as a single last HCV RNA \< 50 International Units Per Millilitre (IU/mL) measured \>= 20 weeks after treatment end, ie, \>=140 days after treatment end.
Time frame: Up to 72 weeks (Group A) and 48 weeks (Group D)
Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response (Groups A + B vs Groups C + D)
SVR was defined as the percentage of participants with a undetectable hepatitis C virus- ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) 24 weeks after the end of the treatment period (defined as a single last HCV RNA \< 50 International Units Per Millilitre (IU/mL) measured \>= 20 weeks after treatment end, ie, \>=140 days after treatment end.
Time frame: At Week 48 and Week 72
Number of Participants With Sustained Virological Response (Groups A + C vs Groups B + D)
SVR was defined as the percentage of participants with a undetectable hepatitis C virus- ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) 24 weeks after the end of the treatment period (defined as a single last HCV RNA \< 50 International Units Per Millilitre (IU/mL) measured \>= 20 weeks after treatment end, ie, \>=140 days after treatment end.
Time frame: At Week 48 and Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable HCV-RNA
The percentage of participants with a undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after the end of the treatment period (defined as a single last HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL measured \>= 20 weeks after treatment end, ie, \>=140 days after treatment end) are reported. End-of-treatment (EOT) virological response is defined as last HCV RNA measurement that is not detectable (\<50 IU/mL) at study day of last dose of study medication (+/- 28 days).
Time frame: At Week 12, 24, 48 and EOT
Percentage of Participants With >=2log Drop in HCV-RNA
Reduction in HCV-RNA titers of at least 2 log10 after 12/24 weeks of study treatment (i.e. 99% reduction of viral load) was analyzed. Percentage of participants with at least a 2 log10 drop of HCV-RNA at study week 12 and 24 (lower limit of quantitation 600 IU/mL) as compared to baseline or non-detectable HCV-RNA (lower limit of detection 50 IU/mL) were reported.
Time frame: At Week 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Reduction of HCV Viremia (Groups A + B vs Groups C + D)
The mean change from baseline in HCV RNA level (reduction in viral load) at Week 12 and 24 were determined. HCV RNA result were not detectable (\<50 IU/ML) and not quantifiable (\<600 IU/ML). Baseline value were assessed on Day 1 before the administration of the first dose of study drug.
Time frame: At Week 12 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Maintenance of Actual End-of-Treatment Virological Response
Maintenance of end-of-treatment virological response was assessed based on all participants treated and according to the actual treatment period (backward imputation method). The percentage of participants who maintained their end-of-treatment virological response was determined. Maintenance of actual end-of-treatment virological response was calculated by dividing the number of participants with a virological response both at the end of the actual untreated follow-up period and at the end of the actual treatment period by the number of participants with a virological response at the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 96 (Group A and C) and Week 72 (Group B and D)
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After End of Treatment
The percentage of participants who relapsed (loss of response) after having achieved a virological response at the end of treatment was determined.
Time frame: Week 96 (Group A and C) and Week 72 (Group B and D)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ukiah, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Unnamed facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
...and 94 more locations