The goal of this clinical trial is to compare MDMA-assisted therapy to placebo with therapy in people with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The main question it aims to answer is: Is there a reduction in PTSD symptoms among people given MDMA-assisted therapy compared to placebo with therapy? Participants will receive either MDMA-assisted therapy or placebo with therapy during two blinded experimental sessions spaced three to five weeks apart. During experimental sessions, participants receive an initial dose of 125 mg of MDMA HCl, or placebo, followed by a dose of 62.5 mg of MDMA HCl, or placebo. During this treatment period, participants will also undergo non-drug preparatory psychotherapy sessions and non-drug integrative sessions. The study will test whether MDMA-assisted therapy can be safely given to participants. Researchers will compare PTSD symptoms in the MDMA-assisted therapy group to the placebo with therapy group to see if there is a reduction in symptoms after the treatment period.
This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study assessed the safety and effectiveness of MDMA-assisted therapy among people with chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD, including veterans. Participants were assigned to receive either MDMA-assisted therapy or placebo with therapy during two blinded experimental sessions spaced three to five weeks apart during Stage 1 of the study. During these experimental sessions, participants received an initial dose of 125 mg of MDMA HCl followed by a supplemental dose of 62.5 mg of MDMA HCl, or they received initial and supplemental doses of inactive placebo. Psychotherapists and independent raters were blinded to participants' treatment conditions. This treatment period also consisted of non-drug preparatory therapy sessions and non-drug integration therapy sessions. During Stage 2 of the study, the blind was broken and participants assigned to receive MDMA-assisted therapy in Stage 1 underwent a third open-label experimental session of MDMA-assisted therapy. Participants assigned placebo with therapy during Stage 1 who chose to enroll in Stage 2 underwent three open-label sessions of MDMA-assisted therapy. Outcome measures were administered two months after the second experimental session in Stage 1 and four to six weeks after the second MDMA-assisted therapy session in Stage 2. A final data-collection session took place at two months after the third experimental session. The primary objective of the study was to measure change in PTSD symptoms via CAPS-IV across the study in participants receiving MDMA-assisted therapy versus placebo with therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
23
125 mg of midomafetamine HCl followed by a supplemental half-dose of 62.5 mg of midomafetamine HCl
125 mg followed by a supplemental half-dose of 62.5 mg
Non-directive therapy provided by a team of two co-therapists
Offices of Michael Mithoefer MD
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-IV) From Baseline to 2-month Follow-up
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS-IV) is a clinician administered and scored assessment of PTSD symptoms via structured interview based upon PTSD diagnosis in DSM-IV. The total severity score is a sum of symptom frequency and intensity scores for the subscales B (re-experiencing), C (avoidance) and D (hypervigilance) and ranges from 0 to 136, with higher scores indicating greater severity of PTSD symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to 2 months post second experimental session
Change in Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) From Baseline to 2-month Follow-up
The Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report measure (for DSM-IV) designed to measure the extent to which a given stressful life event produces subjective distress. Each item corresponds directly to 14 of the 17 DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD and is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") for the extent to which the item was true for the participant during the past seven days. The IES-R yields a total score ranging from 0 to 88 with higher scores indicated greater distress.
Time frame: Baseline to 2 months post second experimental session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.