Although some doctors favor starting anti-HIV treatment as soon as possible after patients learn they are infected, it is not known if treatment for recently infected patients results in long-term benefits or harm. The purpose of this study is to learn whether or not people should take anti-HIV drugs when they are first infected.
Combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in significantly decreased morbidity and mortality, incidence of opportunistic infections, and hospitalizations in HIV infected people. However, because of long-term toxicities associated with long-term use of antiretrovirals and the persistence of virus in latent reservoirs, it is unclear when it is best to initiate therapy in recently infected individuals. This study compared the virologic outcomes of adults recently infected with HIV who received emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF), coformulated as Truvada, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), coformulated as Kaletra \[immediate treatment (IT arm)\], with those who received no treatment \[deferred treatment (DT arm)\]. The original study lasted 96 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups (IT arm vs. DT arm). For the first 36 weeks of the study, IT arm participants received FTC/TDF once daily and LPV/RTV twice daily. Some IT arm participants received a different ART regimen as determined by the participant and study staff, if appropriate. DT arm participants received no treatment for the duration of the study. At Week 37, participants from both arms were offered treatment continuation or initiation until Week 96 if they had a high viral load, low CD4 count, or experienced HIV-related symptoms (Step 2). Study visits occurred at screening, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 37, 38, 40, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Clinical assessment and blood collection occurred at all visits. Urine tests occurred at selected visits. Participants were asked to complete an adherence questionnaire at Weeks 12, 24, and 36. Per the recommendations the DSMB review in June 2009, this protocol was terminated as originally written with the exception of those participants in the IT arm in the middle of the first 36 weeks of treatment. Those participants were to continue on treatment until the end of the 36 weeks. At that point treatment decisions were made on best practice guidelines. In addition, the study duration was extended to include a 5 year follow up of participants who did not initiate long-term antiretroviral therapy (Step 3). The study was reviewed by an SMC on December 8, 2010. The SMC recommended the study close to long term follow-up because only very few participants enrolled in this portion of the study. All the results except for the CD4 analysis and time to treatment initiation and deaths were based on the database frozen on July 2, 2009. The results for the CD4 analysis and time to treatment initiation and deaths were based on the database frozen on January 30, 2012.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
130
once daily
twice daily
Ranked Log10 HIV-1 RNA Viral Load (log10 Copies/mL) Averaged at 72 and 76 Weeks for the IT Arm and DT Arm
The primary endpoint is (i) the average of log10 viral loads (VL) at wks 72 and 76 for participants who continued to wk 72 off ARV for the DT arm, (ii) average wk 72 and 76 VL for those who continued to wk 36 off ARV for the IT arm and (iii) an assigned VL rank for the "failures" who needed ARVs or met criteria for entry into Step 2 prior to these study visits. The assigned rank for the failures was either the last observed rank carried forward or the worst rank relative to the other possible outcomes. This approach was designed to, if anything, bias against finding a treatment effect. To illustrate, consider five participants who enter the study (A, B, C, D, and E), 4 of whom (A, B, C, D) make it to 72 wks off therapy with RNA levels that increase from A to D. Participant E enters Step 2 at wk 12, at which time his RNA is in the 50th percentile. This rank would be carried forward, so the rank order of the log10 HIV-1 RNA endpoints would be A B E C D.
Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 76
Ranked log10 HIV-1 RNA Viral Load (log10 Copies/mL) Averaged at Weeks 72 and 76 for the IT Arm and Ranked log10 HIV-1 RNA Viral Load (log10 Copies/mL) Averaged at Weeks 36 and 40 for the DT Arm
The primary endpoint is (i) average wk 36 and 40 VL for those who continued to wk 36 off ARV for the DT arm, (ii) average wk 72 and 76 VL for those who continued to wk 36 off ARV for the IT arm and (iii) an assigned VL rank for the "failures" who needed ARVs or met criteria for entry into Step 2 prior to these study visits. The assigned rank for the failures was either the last observed rank carried forward or the worst rank relative to the other possible outcomes. This approach was designed to, if anything, bias against finding a treatment effect. To illustrate, consider five participants who enter the study (A, B, C, D, and E), 4 of whom (A, B, C, D) make it to 72 wks off therapy with RNA levels that increase from A to D. Participant E enters Step 2 at wk 12, at which time his RNA is in the 50th percentile. This rank would be carried forward, so the rank order of the log10 HIV-1 RNA endpoints would be A B E C D.
Time frame: IT arm (weeks 72 and 76) and DT arm ( weeks 36 and 40)
Number of Participants Experiencing Either a CDC Category B or C Diagnosis, CD4<200 Cells/mm^3 or CD4 Percent <14%.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ucsd, Avrc Crs (701)
San Diego, California, United States
Ucsf Aids Crs (801)
San Francisco, California, United States
Harbor-UCLA Med. Ctr. CRS (603)
Torrance, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital CRS (6101)
Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of Miami AIDS CRS (901)
Miami, Florida, United States
The Ponce de Leon Center CRS
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University CRS (2701)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush Univ. Med. Ctr. ACTG CRS (2702)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Indiana University Hospital (2601)
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
IHV Baltimore Treatment CRS (4651)
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
...and 17 more locations
Time frame: 96 weeks since randomization
Change in CD4 Counts Cells/mm^3 From Week 36 for IT Arm and From Week 0 for DT Arm
Time frame: IT arm (weeks 36, 60, 72, 84 and 96) and DT arm (weeks 0, 24, 36, 48 and 60)
Number of Participants Meeting Clinical, Virologic, or Immunologic Criteria for Treatment Initiation or Re-initiation
The clinical, virologic, or immunologic criteria for treatment initiation or re-initiation include CD4 count below 350 cells/mm\^3 on two consecutive determinations at least 4 weeks apart, at least 12 weeks into the study or 12 weeks post-treatment discontinuation, (2) confirmed CD4 count below 200 cells/mm\^3 or CD4 percent below 14% at any time on study, (3) confirmed HIV-1 RNA level above 750,000 copies/mL 4 weeks into the study or above 200,000 copies/mL 12 weeks or more into the study, or (4) CDC Category B or C diagnosis.
Time frame: 96 weeks since randomization
Number of Participants in IT Arm Off Treatment Before 36 Weeks
The study provided fixed-dose combination emtricitabine/tenofovir DF 200/300 mg orally once daily and lopinavir/ritonavir 200/50 mg administered either as two tablets twice daily or four tablets once daily, for the first 36 weeks for individuals in the IT arm.
Time frame: At Week 36
Time to Meeting the Clinical, Virologic, or Immunologic Criteria for Treatment Initiation or Re-initiation
5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles in weeks from randomization to meeting the criteria for treatment initiation or re-initiation which include CD4 count below 350 cells/mm\^3 on two consecutive measurements at least 4 weeks apart, at least 12 weeks into the study or 12 weeks post-treatment discontinuation, confirmed CD4 count below 200 cells/mm\^3 or CD4 percent below 14% at any time on study, confirmed HIV-1 RNA level above 750,000 copies/mL 4 weeks into the study or above 200,000 copies/mL 12 weeks or more into the study, or CDC Category B or C diagnosis.
Time frame: 96 weeks since randomization
Time From Study Entry in DT Arm Participants or From Week 36 in IT Arm Participants to Meeting the Clinical, Virologic, or Immunologic Criteria for Treatment Initiation or Re-initiation
5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles in weeks from randomization for DT arm or from week 36 for IT arm to meeting the criteria for treatment initiation or re-initiation which include two consecutive CD4 count below 350 cells/mm\^3 at least 4 weeks apart, at least 12 weeks into the study or 12 weeks post-treatment discontinuation, confirmed CD4 count below 200 cells/mm\^3 or CD4 percent below 14% at any time on study, confirmed HIV-1 RNA level above 750,000 copies/mL 4 weeks into the study or above 200,000 copies/mL 12 weeks or more into the study, or CDC Category B or C diagnosis.
Time frame: 96 weeks since randomization
Time to Treatment Initiation or Death
5th, 10th, 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles in weeks from randomization to treatment initiation or death
Time frame: 5 years since randomization