OBJECTIVE: This study is being conducted by the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group, funded by the National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with the European C-Peptide Group. The goal is to evaluate comparability and reproducibility of measures of beta cell function in type 1 diabetes comparing the mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) and glucagon stimulation test (GST). These two tests will be compared to assess the relationship between the MMTT and IV (intravenous) Glucagon stimulated C-peptide responses as measured by time to peak C-peptide and AUC (area under the curve) values. Based on the understanding that type 1 diabetes results from an immune mediated loss of pancreatic beta cells, therapeutic trials and newer measures of beta cell function can be evaluated as endpoints for clinical trials. Direct assessment of residual beta cell function is an appropriate endpoint, as retention of beta cell function in patients with T1D is known to result in improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia, retinopathy and nephropathy. Endogenous beta cell function or insulin secretion is best measured by determination of C-peptide (which is co-secreted with insulin in a 1:1 molar ratio). Intervention studies over the past few decades have usually used measurement of C-peptide. However, the relationship between these or other measures of beta cell function has not been well studied. The relative advantages of one measure over another in terms of variability, sensitivity and burden to the subject is unknown. In addition, the optimal conditions for the conduct of the test need to be determined. An important goal is to develop an international consensus about the conduct of metabolic tests in the context of large, multicenter trials involving type 1 diabetes (T1D) by balancing the scientific data with the burden on the subject.
Overview: The study is a multi-center, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. Each participant will undergo four tests within a limited period according to the test sequence assignment. The tests will randomly start with either MMTT or GST. Specific Aims * To compare the reliability of the MMTT and Glucagon stimulated C-peptide responses as measured by time to peak C-peptide on MMTT, and the peak and AUC values on both tests. * To determine the relationship between MMTT and Glucagon stimulated C-peptide responses as measured by time to peak C-peptide on MMTT and peak and AUC values on both tests. * To determine the impact of basal glucose, peak glucose, age of participant, time from diagnosis, and basal C-peptide with respect to the reliability of measures and relationship between MMTT and Glucagon results. * Describe the palatability of, patient compliance with, and adverse effects of each test (MMTT vs. GST) and to compare the participant and investigator burden to conduct the MMTT and Glucagon tests. TEST INFORMATION: * Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT): BOOST is a liquid meal (like a milkshake) containing a standard amount of fat, protein, and carbohydrate. BOOST raises blood sugar and causes the pancreas to produce insulin. After drinking BOOST, about one-half teaspoon of blood will be drawn through an IV line in the arm after 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. (Using an IV line avoids multiple needle sticks). The test takes about 2 hours. * Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST): Glucagon is a hormone that circulates in the blood and stimulates insulin secretion. Glucagon will be injected into the bloodstream through an IV line, and about one-half teaspoon of blood will be drawn five times during ten minutes. The test takes about 30 minutes. OTHER TEST INFORMATION: * Participants will have tests on four different days over a six week period. Participants will have either a) two MMTTs and then two GSTs OR b) two GSTs and then two MMTTs. Each test will be done 3-10 days apart. * Participants will follow a special high carbohydrate diet (150 grams) for at least three days prior to each study visit. Dietary information will be provided. * Participants will fast overnight (at least 8 hours) and arrive at the clinic between 7 AM - 10 AM. * It is essential that participants have a blood glucose level of 70-200 mg/dl in the morning before starting the test. If blood glucose is too high or too low the morning of the test, the test will be re-scheduled on another day. * Tests will be re-scheduled if, on the morning of the test, your blood sugar or ketones are not within acceptable ranges. Testing could take up to eight visits if tests need to be re-scheduled. * Participants will learn whether their pancreas is still secreting insulin and, if so, how much insulin is being secreted. This information may help their diabetes health care team design for them a better insulin regimen and diabetes management program to improve their longterm blood sugar control. * This study will help researchers learn which test (MMTT or GST) is best to use in other research studies looking at treatments that may stop or delay type 1 diabetes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, United States
Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, United States
Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center/ Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
...and 8 more locations
Stimulated C-peptide response derived from the 2-hour MMTT and the glucagon stimulation test (GST)
Time to peak C-peptide on MMTT, and the peak and AUC values from each test
Co-efficient of reproducibility of the MMTT, and the GST, provided from the duplicate tests within the same individuals
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.