Patients with stage I and II low grade follicular lymphoma are randomised between standard therapy (involved field radiotherapy) and investigational therapy (involved field radiotherapy and chemotherapy plus rituximab). The main endpoint is progression free survival but overall survival and the influence of t(14;18) status will also be studied.
Radiotherapy is the only modality which has been proven to have curative potential in patients with localised low grade lymphoma. Despite excellent control of the local tumour, most patients relapse outside the area treated with radiation and most of these ultimately die from lymphoma. This study tests the hypothesis that the addition of six cycles of chemotherapy plus rituximab (systemic chemotherapy) can eradicate undetectable lymphoma deposits outside the radiation field and thereby improve the cure rate. The study will specifically test the hypothesis that six cycles of adjuvant CVP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone) in combination with Rituximab will improve progression-free survival for patients with stage I and II low-grade follicular lymphoma treated with involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT). That is, will patients given radiotherapy plus systemic chemotherapy live longer or remain free from disease longer than patients treated with radiation alone? Radiotherapy alone is widely regarded as the standard treatment for this disease. There are a number of secondary endpoints to the study, as follows: 1. Comparison the pre- and post-treatment prevalence of the t(14:18) translocation, in peripheral blood and bone marrow, of patients treated with either IFRT alone or IFRT plus chemotherapy. This translocation is potentially a marker for minimal residual disease and eradication of the marker from blood cells may have prognostic implications. The clinical value of "molecular remission" as an early predictor of freedom from progression (FFP) and survival will be assessed. 2. Comparison of overall survival and FFP for patients treated with IFRT alone with overall survival and FFP for patients treated with combined IFRT and systemic therapy. Delay of progression of disease may be of limited value if overall survival is the same. 3. Comparison of acute and late toxicity and second malignancy rates for patients treated with IFRT or IFRT plus systemic therapy. 4. Delineation of the location of first relapse in relation to radiation therapy fields.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
1000 mg/m2 I.V. on day 1
The prescribed dose to the target volume will be 30 Gy. Daily fractions of 1.5-2.0 Gy will be employed.
1.4 mg/m2 (maximum single dose of 2 mg) I.V. on day 1
The Canberra Hospital
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Progression Free Survival (PFS). Period from the date of randomisation to 1st progression of disease or death from any cause.
Time frame: Main analysis after at least 3 years of follow-up following the end of accrual. An updated analysis may be done on completion of 5 years follow-up after the end of accrual. Long term follow-up analysis is planned after 10 years of follow-up
Pre- and post-treatment prevalence of the t(14;18) translocation, in peripheral blood and bone marrow between arms
Time frame: Peripheral blood at commencement of treatment, after 1 year and upon relapse is collected and stored for later analysis to be done as part of translational studies when funding becomes available
Overall Survival (OS)
Period from date of randomisation to date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Main analysis will be done on completion of 5 years follow-up after the end of accrual. An interim analysis to be done after at least 3 years of follow-up. A futility analysis will be performed after the 5 year analysis. In the absence of futility being
Location of first relapse
Period from date of randomisation to date of first relapse location via CT scan and or other imaging as required
Time frame: Main analysis after at least 3 years of follow-up following the end of accrual. An updated analysis may be done on completion of 5 years follow-up after the end of accrual
To compare time to evolution to higher histological grade
Period from date of randomisation to date of higher histological grade via CT scan and or other imaging as required
Time frame: Main analysis after at least 3 years of follow-up following the end of accrual. An updated analysis may be done on completion of 5 years follow-up after the end of accrual
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
50 mg/m2 orally daily for days 1 - 5
375 mg/m2 IV Infusion day 1
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
Albury Base/Murray Valley Private Hospital
West Albury, New South Wales, Australia
Illawarra Cancer Care Centre
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Radiation Oncology - Mater Centre
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Genesis Cancer Care (previously Premion)
Tugun, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
...and 11 more locations
Freedom from progression.
Period from date of randomisation to date of first disease progression.
Time frame: Main analysis after at least 3 years of follow-up following the end of accrual. An updated analysis may be done on completion of 5 years follow-up after the end of accrual. Long term follow-up analysis is planned after 10 years of follow-up
Acute and late toxicities and secondary malignances
Time frame: Frame after at least 3 years of follow-up following the end of accrual. An updated analysis may be done on completion of 5 years follow-up after the end of accrual