This primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for the treatment of pre-core mutant chronic hepatitis B. Participants will receive TDF or ADV for 48 weeks (double-blind). After 48 weeks, eligible participants switched to open-label TDF for up to 480 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
382
300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
10 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Tablet administered orally once daily
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48
Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 96
Time frame: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384
Time frame: Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480
Time frame: Weeks 432 and 480
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Tablet administered orally once daily
200/300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet administered orally once daily
Unnamed facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Pasadena, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Francisco, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Jose, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unnamed facility
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Unnamed facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unnamed facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
...and 70 more locations
Time frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48
Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240
Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 240
Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48
The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240
The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Time frame: Baseline; Week 240
Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48
Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240
Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 240
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 48
ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 96
ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 96
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384
ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480
ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480
Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Time frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)
Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480