The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the relative effectiveness of two asthma action plans (pictorial versus written) in terms of asthma action plan knowledge, medication use, and family satisfaction with asthma education.
Asthma medical regimens are complex for families, requiring changes in the types and amounts of medication based on the frequency and intensity of symptoms. Written asthma action plans (AAP's) are commonly used to provide a set of instructions to help parents and children implement these complicated regimens. However, written AAP's require substantial literacy levels, so for younger children, low-literacy families, or non-English speaking families, a pictorial version of the AAP may be more understandable and useful. The study aims to validate a newly developed, fully pictorial AAP in terms of its relative impact on parent- and child-reported knowledge of the action plan, medication use, and parent- and child-reported satisfaction, when compared to a standard-care written AAP.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
4
The Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Scores on the Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview
Measures recall of asthma treatment plan
Time frame: 1 month
Adherence to Controller Medication
Mean daily adherence to medication measured via electronic monitoring
Time frame: 1 month
Rescue Medication Use
Number of puffs of inhaled rescue medication
Time frame: 1 month
Family satisfaction survey scores
Family ratings of satisfaction with asthma action plan
Time frame: 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.