This double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluates moxifloxacin versus isoniazid in daily treatment during the first two months of treatment with rifampin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol for sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis.
The primary objective of this Phase 2 clinical trial is to compare the safety and antimicrobial activity of a moxifloxacin-containing regimen (moxifloxacin, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol \[MRZE\]) in which moxifloxacin has been substituted for isoniazid, to the standard control regimen (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol \[HRZE\]) in the first two months of treatment of sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. The assessment of antimicrobial activity will be sputum culture-conversion. Higher rates of sputum culture conversion after 2 months of treatment with a moxifloxacin-containing regimen would support Phase 3 clinical trials of moxifloxacin in treatment regimens of less than the current 6 month standard regimens. Rationale - Current treatment of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis requires a minimum of 6 months, a treatment duration that is challenging for patients and tuberculosis control programs. Therefore, a high priority in tuberculosis research is the identification of agents that can shorten treatment. Several fluoroquinolone antibiotics have potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) in preclinical testing. Of the currently available fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin has excellent activity in vitro and in animal models of tuberculosis, a favorable pharmacokinetic profile (serum half-life of 10-12 hours), lack of problematic drug-drug interactions, no need for dosage adjustment for renal and hepatic insufficiency, and an excellent safety profile. In addition, in the murine model of tuberculosis, the substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid resulted in significant reductions in the time to culture conversion and the time to sterilization when compared to the standard combination rifampin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide. However, moxifloxacin has not been fully evaluated in humans for tuberculosis treatment. There is a need to assess not only the anti-tuberculosis activity of moxifloxacin-containing regimens, but also the safety of more prolonged therapy with moxifloxacin. Two-month culture conversion rates are a well-accepted surrogate marker for the sterilizing activity of anti-tuberculosis drugs. Rifampin and pyrazinamide, the key drugs in current 6-month regimens, markedly increase 2-month culture-conversion rates. Therefore, this study will use 2-month culture conversion rate as the measure of antimicrobial activity of moxifloxacin.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
433
Moxifloxacin 400mg daily, 8 weeks
isoniazid, oral, 300 mg, daily, 8 weeks
• To compare the culture-conversion rate at the end of the intensive phase of therapy of the moxifloxacin regimen vs. that of the isoniazid regimen
Time frame: 8 weeks
To compare the safety and tolerability of the moxifloxacin regimen to that of the isoniazid regimen
Time frame: 8 weeks
To determine the time to culture-conversion of the moxifloxacin regimen and the isoniazid regimen using data from 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-week cultures
Time frame: 8 weeks
To compare the proportion of patients with any Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions
Time frame: 8 weeks
To compare adverse events and 2-month culture conversion rates among HIV-infected patients vs. HIV-uninfected patients
Time frame: 8 weeks
To compare the rates of treatment failure of the moxifloxacin regimen and the isoniazid regimen
Time frame: 6 months
To determine whether there is delayed toxicity attributable to moxifloxacin (toxicity that becomes evident after the 8 weeks of moxifloxacin therapy)
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Veterans Administration Medical Center of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
University of Southern California Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California at San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
University of California, San Francincisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Denver Public Health Department
Denver, Colorado, United States
Washington DC Veterans Administration Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Hines Veterans Administration Medical Center
Hines, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
...and 16 more locations