The study compares 2 different methods of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of localised lung cancer in patients not suitable for surgery. Hypothesis(es) to be tested: 1. Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy is superior to gemcitabine + high dose palliative radiotherapy in terms of efficacy in a multi-institutional setting 2. Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy is superior to gemcitabine + high dose palliative radiotherapy in terms of feasibility in a multi-institutional setting 3. Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy has a favourable toxicity profile relative to gemcitabine + high-dose palliative radiotherapy
A third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with Stage IIIA or IIIB disease, which is not amenable to curative resection. Single modality local therapy, either surgery or radiation, only cures a fraction of such patients. Radical radiation is not feasible for all patients with unresectable Stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, based upon the extent of the loco-regional disease or the medical state of the patient. Patients of good performance status receiving protracted high-dose palliative radiotherapy do obtain a survival benefit from this therapy. Studies have shown a survival advantage by adding chemotherapy to radical radiation therapy: but studies in the high-dose palliative radiotherapy setting are lacking. Two regimens of concurrent chemotherapy with high-dose palliative radiotherapy have been developed locally, with established MTDs. These 2 regimens do warrant a comparative assessment in a phase II trial, prior to a phase III trial against high dose palliative radiation alone (36Gy/12#/5). This is a randomised phase II trial comprising of 2 arms for randomization as follows: Arm A:External beam radiation, 40 Gy/20#/5 per week, Plus concurrent Vinorelbine, IV, 25mg/m2, days 1, 8, 22 and + Cisplatin 20mg/m2, IV, weekly Arm B:External beam radiation, 30 Gy/15#/5 per week, Plus concurrentGemcitabine, 200mg (flat dose) IV days 1, 8, 15 An equal number of patients will be randomised to each arm. The randomisation will be carried out by the Princess Alexandra Trial Centre. Patients will be assessed at baseline, weekly during treatment, and then at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post treatment then 3 monthly thereafter.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
82
IV, 25mg/m2, days 1, 8, 22
External beam radiation, 40 Gy/20#/5 per week
200mg (flat dose) IV days 1, 8, 15
20mg/m2, IV, weekly
External beam radiation, 30 Gy/15#/5 per week
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Mater Misericordiae Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
North Queensland Oncology Service
Townsville, Queensland, Australia
The John Flynn Hospital
Tugun, Queensland, Australia
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Border Medical Oncology
Wondonga, Victoria, Australia
Objective response rate (RECIST criteria)
Time frame: Final analysis will occur when all have a minimum 1 year follow-up after randomisation. Approx 3 years after start of trial.
Symptomatic response rate
Time frame: Final analysis will occur when all have a minimum 1 year follow-up after randomisation. Approx 3 years after start of trial.
The feasibility (i.e. % of patients who cannot complete the planned RT dose or who require a break for toxicity) and problems encountered with protocol compliance in the setting of a multi-institutional TROG study.
Time frame: Final analysis will occur when all have a minimum 1 year follow-up after randomisation. Approx 3 years after start of trial.
Toxicity of both treatments
Time frame: Final analysis will occur when all have a minimum 1 year follow-up after randomisation. Approx 3 years after start of trial.
Progression-free survival
Time frame: Final analysis will occur when all have a minimum 1 year follow-up after randomisation. Approx 3 years after start of trial.
QOL as assessed by FACT-L version 4.
Time frame: Final analysis will occur when all have a minimum 1 year follow-up after randomisation. Approx 3 years after start of trial.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.