In this randomized study dealing with the ablative treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation, two ablation strategies are compared: a more anatomically guided linear ablation scheme versus an electrophysiological guided focal ablation strategy aiming at the electrical isolating of the pulmonary veins and ablating areas of fragmented intracardiac electrograms thought to maintain atrial fibrillation.
This randomized study deals with two different ablative treatment strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a more anatomically guided linear ablation scheme with encircling of the ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PV), a left atrial roof line and an anterior line bridging the anterior mitral anulus to the ostium of the left superior PV versus an electrophysiological guided focal ablation strategy aiming at isolating, electrically, the PV and ablating areas of fragmented intracardiac electrograms thought to maintain atrial fibrillation. Both ablation approaches contain isolation of the most common source of triggering foci, i.e., the pulmonary veins and additional modification of the substrate maintaining atrial fibrillation. The study endpoint is a combined efficacy/safety analysis. Extensive follow-up with three-monthly 7 days holter ECG is provided.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
116
linear lesions to ablate persistent atrial fibrillation
focal electrophysiologically guided ablations to treat persistent atrial fibrillation
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Munich, Germany
RECRUITINGSinus rhythm in follow-up
Time frame: Sinus rhythm in follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.