The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antidepressant effectiveness of Geodon for the treatment of patients diagnosed with Bipolar II disorder who are currently experiencing a major depressive episode.
Bipolar II disorder is largely unstudied, with much less known about its treatment in comparison to Bipolar I disorder. While established mood stabilizers treat and prevent subsequent episodes of hypomania, chronic or recurrent depressions are harder to treat or prevent. In general the treatment of depression in Bipolar II patients is often complicated and there is no clinical unanimity on what approaches to follow. Administration of proven antidepressants would seem most appropriate and are most often used, but their use often involves a number of difficulties. Among these are: * antidepressant efficacy is established for unipolar patients and extrapolation to Bipolar II patients is done without empirical support * Bipolar II patients can have switches into hypomanic behavior in response to antidepressant treatment given as monotherapy * even when mood stabilizers are concomitantly given, switches to hypomanic states still occur when antidepressants are added * antidepressants can cause cycle acceleration or induce rapid cycling when given to Bipolar II patients * non-response and loss of response are common reactions to antidepressants in Bipolar II patients This study will also assess the tolerability of Geodon in the treatment of patients diagnosed with Bipolar II disorder who currently meet criteria for a Major Depressive Episode by examining the incidence of adverse events and the withdrawal rate due to adverse events. This will be an open-label study. Subjects will be treated for 8 weeks with Geodon, starting at a dose of 20 mg twice per day. The maximum dose will be 60 mg twice per day. Subjects will have a physical exam, electrocardiogram (ECG), standard laboratory tests and a urine drug screen at the screen visit. Efficacy evaluations will include 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Young Mania Rating Scale. Social outcome will be measured with a quality-of-life scale (the Q-LES-Q). Overall efficacy will be rated using the Clinical Global Severity and Improvement Scales.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Ziprasidone 20-60 mg BID, taken orally.
Medical Research Network, L.L.C.
New York, New York, United States
The Mech Center
Plano, Texas, United States
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Comparison of Baseline and Week 8 Endpoint in the 17-item HAM-D Total Scores
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-54, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
Time frame: Week 8
Mean Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A)
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, measuring anxiety symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety.
Time frame: Week 8
Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Global Inventory (CGI) Global Improvement Score of 1 or 2
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale: one item, measuring overall improvement of illness; possible scores range from 1-7, with lower scores representing greater improvement. 18 subjects (60%) were responders (defined as having a CGI-I scores of 1 or 2 at Week 8/study endpoint) by the end of the trial.
Time frame: Week 8
Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Study Endpoint
Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale: one item, measuring overall severity of illness; possible scores range from 1-7, with higher scores representing greater severity of illness.
Time frame: Week 8
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) scale consists of 14 items; possible scores range from 14-70 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and satisfaction.
Time frame: Week 8
Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Beck Depression Inventory, self-rated scale measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-63, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.
Time frame: Week 8