The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of 7.5 mg meloxicam i.m. once daily compared with 7.5 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p.o. in patients with osteoarthritis over a time period of 7 days.
This was a randomized (1:1), open-label, multi-center, active-control, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of 7.5 mg meloxicam i.m. once daily compared with 7.5 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p.o. in patients with osteoarthritis over a time period of 7 days. The primary endpoint: Pain on active movement, The secondary endpoint: * Pain at rest * Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition assessed by the patient/investigator * Patient's assessment of arthritic condition * Onset of action * Time to maximum pain relief * Paracetamol consumption * Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy * Final global assessment of efficacy by the patient/investigator Safety endpoints * Local tolerability assessment of the injections by the patient/investigator * Patient's /Investigator's assessment of overall tolerability * Number, nature and severity of adverse events * Laboratory investigations * Withdrawals due to safety reasons Patients eligible for the trial who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and who gave their informed consent were randomized to one of two treatment groups (i.e. meloxicam ampoule or meloxicam tablet). The study period totaled 8-14 days included screening, randomisation, study drug administration, and 7-day follow-up. The relevant assessment were performed on the day of randomisation and 7-day follow up. Study Hypothesis: The null hypothesis of interest is that the primary endpoint for meloxicam ampoule is inferior to oral meloxicam. The alternative is that meloxicam ampoule is noninferior to the oral meloxicam . Comparison(s): The primary endpoint of the study was to assess pain on active movement by VAS prior and after the treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
168
People's Hospital, Beijing University
Beijing, China
Beijing Xuan Wu Hospital
Beijing, China
1st Affiliated, Anhui Medical University
Hefei City, Anhui Province, China
Qilu Hospital, Shang Dong University
Nanzhou, China
Pain on active movement by VAS.
Time frame: day 0, day 7
Pain at rest
Time frame: up to 7 days
Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition
Time frame: up to 7 days
Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy
Time frame: up to 7 days
Onset of Analgesic action
Time frame: up to 7 days
Time to maximum pain relief
Time frame: up to 7 days
Paracetamol consumption
Time frame: up to 7 days
Final global assessment of efficacy by patient
Time frame: up to 7 days
Final global assessment of efficacy by investigator
Time frame: up to 7 days
Assessment of local tolerability
Time frame: up to 7 days
Nature and severity of adverse events
Time frame: up to 7 days
Change in other laboratory investigations
Time frame: up to 7 days
Withdrawals due to safety reasons
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Shanghai Renji Hospital
Shanghai, China
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Shanghai, China
Shanghai Guanghai Hospital
Shanghai, China
Shanghai Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, China
Time frame: up to 7 days
Patient's and investigator's assessment of overall tolerability
Time frame: up to 7 days