Primary objective : To evaluate the quality of fractures setting and osteotomy of the facial massif osteosynthesised with resorbable device PLLA/PGA compared with usual Titanium plates. Secondary objective : * To evaluate the resorbable device ergonomy versus Titanium. * To evaluate the clinical tolerance of resorbable device versus Titanium. Hypothesis : Osteosynthesis with resorbable device demonstrates a non inferiority success probability regarding the success observed in osteosynthesis with Titanium, with a less important probability of re-operation. Study duration : 14 months for each patient. Study treatment : * Group I : Resorbable device PLLA/PGA. * Group II : Titanium device. Study visits : \- Screening visit - Baseline with randomization and surgery - Day1 - Day 21 - Day 45(Traumatology)/Day 90 (orthognatic) - Month 6,12 and 14. Randomization : Stratification by centres, mono or bimaxillar surgery and traumatologic or orthognatic criteria.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
308
Pierre Bouletreau
Lyon, France
RECRUITINGThe quality of fractures setting and osteotomy of the facial massif osteosynthesised with resorbable device PLLA/PGA will be evaluated by the notion of unperfect resuts.
Evaluation of device ergonomy :
The operative time of each surgery will be monitored, to compare operative duration of operations ; the only variable will be the osteosynthesis method.
Clinical tolerance of the devices
pain (Visual Analogic Scale),
local inflammation,
scar disunion,
infection,
subcutaneous or submucous palpation of the plates.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.