The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on coronary plaque volume in patients with acute coronary syndrome and to clarify the relationship between coronary plaque volume, serum lipids, and inflammation markers in order to determine the significance of intensive lipid lowering therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Japan.
Previous mega trials have demonstrated that lipid lowering therapy with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular events by one-third, thus, the benefit of lipid lowering therapy has been substantiated. Such a benefit is significant especially for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP-III) has suggested the advantage of more intensive lipid lowering therapy with a goal of reducing LDL-C below 70 mg/dL for such patients categorized as very high risk. In Japan, Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2002 have recommended that an LDL-C goal for patients with coronary heart disease should be below 100 mg/dL. However, there is no satisfactory evidence yet for the need to lower LDL-C level less than the goal prescribed in Japan. Recently, research on diagnosis of coronary plaque has shown significant advances. The REVERSAL study in patients with a history of CHD, by diagnosis with intravascular ultrasound, suggested that intensive lipid lowering therapy with atorvastatin (80 mg/day) was associated with no growth of plaque (-0.4% compared to baseline), versus therapy with pravastatin (40 mg/day) which showed a slight increase (2.7%) in plaque volume over 18 months. In Japan, the ESTABLISH study, a single center study, indicated that early intensive lipid lowering therapy with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) could induce a significant reduction in plaque volume in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, this benefit has not been verified in multicenter trials in Japan. Further, no comparative investigation into the effect of various concomitant drugs on coronary plaque has been done. Pitavastatin is a chemically synthesized statin in Japan which has been marketed since late 2003. Pitavastatin has an LDL-C lowering effect as strong as atorvastatin and also has a superior HDL-C elevating effect; meanwhile, the effect of pitavastatin on coronary plaque has not been reported.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
307
Pitavastatin 4mg per day
Atorvastatin 20mg per day
Juntendo University School of Medicine
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
Kyoto, Japan
plaque volume
Time frame: one year
total cholesterol (TC)
Time frame: one year
low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time frame: one year
high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (HDL-C)
Time frame: one year
HDL2-C
Time frame: one year
HDL3-C
Time frame: one year
remnant like particles-cholesterol (RLP-C)
Time frame: one year
small dense LDL-C
Time frame: one year
non-HDL-C
Time frame: one year
LDL-C/HDL-C
Time frame: one year
apolipoprotein AI (apoA-I)
Time frame: one year
apoB
Time frame: one year
apoE
Time frame: one year
apoB/apoA-I
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: one year
malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL)
Time frame: one year
phospholipids
Time frame: one year
lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]
Time frame: one year
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Time frame: one year
pentraxin 3
Time frame: one year
leukocytes
Time frame: one year
coronary plaque area at culprit region
Time frame: one year
minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent (%) stenosis
Time frame: one year
major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, Q or non-Q myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization)
Time frame: one year
number of deaths from any cause
Time frame: one year
frequency of adverse drug reactions
Time frame: one year