The primary purpose of this randomized, two-arm parallel clinical study in 66 previously treated patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia A is to compare the rate of bleeding episodes for standard prophylaxis (20-40 IU/kg every 48 ± 6 hours; actual dose determined by the investigator) with that of alternate prophylaxis (20-80 IU/kg every 72 + 6 hours; actual dose determined by Baxter utilizing an algorithm and the patient's pharmacokinetic data). The rates of bleeding episodes for the on-demand regimen and the prophylaxis regimens will also be compared for the cross-over portion of the study. Enrolled patients will be treated originally on demand for a period of 6 months and then they will be randomized into one of the prophylaxis arms. Prophylactic treatment will last for a period of 12 months +/- 2 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
82
Standard prophylaxis: 20-40 IU/kg every 48+/-6 hours, actual dose determined by investigator
PK-driven prophylaxis: 20-80 IU/kg every 72+/-6 hours, actual dose determined by Baxter using an algorithm and the patient´s pharmacokinetic data
Unnamed facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unnamed facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unnamed facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unnamed facility
New York, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unnamed facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unnamed facility
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Unnamed facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unnamed facility
Vienna, Austria
...and 19 more locations
Mean Transformed Annualized Bleed Rate Estimates From Each of the 1-year Prophylaxis Regimens
Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Prophylaxis Regimens (Study Part 2): 1. Standard prophylaxis (20-40 IU/kg (every 48 ±6 hour), exact regimen determined by investigator) 2. PK-driven prophylaxis (20-80 IU/kg (every 72 ±6 hour), exact regimen determined by sponsor) Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X = bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the t-test.
Time frame: 12 months ±2 weeks
Median Annualized Bleed Rate Estimates From Each of the 1 Year Prophylaxis Regimens
Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Prophylaxis Regimens (Part 2 of the study): 1. Standard prophylaxis- infusions every 48 ±6 hours, dosed at 20 to 40 IU/kg. 2. PK-driven prophylaxis- infusions every 72 ±6 hours dosed at 20 to 80 IU/kg.
Time frame: 12 months ±2 weeks
Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate Between On-Demand and Standard Prophylaxis Treatment Regimens
Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the paired t-test. Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR) = (On-Demand Treatment TABR) - (Standard Prophylaxis Treatment TABR). Participants from the On-Demand portion of the study were subsequently randomized to either Standard Prophylaxis or PK-Driven Prophylaxis, (i.e the same participants were analyzed across the two measurement time periods).
Time frame: On-demand 6 months (± 2 weeks); followed by Prophylaxis 12 months (± 2 weeks)
Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate Between On-Demand and PK-Driven Prophylaxis Treatment Regimens
Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the paired t-test. Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR) = (On-Demand Treatment TABR) - (PK-Driven Prophylaxis Treatment TABR) Participants from the On-Demand portion of the study were subsequently randomized to either Standard Prophylaxis or PK-Driven Prophylaxis, (i.e the same participants were analyzed across the two measurement time periods).
Time frame: On-demand 6 months (± 2 weeks); followed by Prophylaxis 12 months (± 2 weeks)
Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate Between On-Demand and Any Prophylaxis Treatment Regimens
Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the paired t-test. Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR) = (On-Demand Treatment TABR) - (Any Prophylaxis Treatment TABR). Any Prophylaxis = Standard or PK-Driven Prophylaxis Participants from the On-Demand portion of the study were subsequently randomized to either Standard Prophylaxis or PK-Driven Prophylaxis, (i.e the same participants were analyzed across the two measurement time periods).
Time frame: On-demand 6 months (± 2 weeks); Prophylaxis 12 months (± 2 weeks)
Total Weight-Adjusted Dose of rAHF-PFM Used Per Year for Each Prophylaxis Arm
Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Prophylaxis Regimens (Part 2 of the study): 1. Standard prophylaxis- infusions every 48 ±6 hours, dosed at 20 to 40 IU/kg. 2. PK-driven prophylaxis- infusions every 72 ±6 hours dosed at 20 to 80 IU/kg.
Time frame: 12 months ±2 weeks
Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1 to ≥4 Infusions
The number of bleeding episodes treated with 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 infusions of rAHF-PFM to achieve adequate hemostasis
Time frame: Throughout the study period (4 years and 5 months)
Assessment of Hemostasis for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes
Number of rAHF-PFM-treated bleeding episodes with an assessment of hemostasis (4-point ordinal scale): Excellent: Full pain relief \& bleeding cessation within \~8 hrs of 1 infusion. Additional infusions may have been given to maintain hemostasis; Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding within \~8 hrs after infusion. Possibly requires \>1 infusion for complete resolution; Fair: Probable or slight relief of pain \& slight improvement in bleeding within \~8 hrs after infusion. Requires \>1 infusion for complete resolution; None: No improvement or condition worsens
Time frame: On-demand 6 months (± 2 weeks); Prophylaxis 12 months (± 2 weeks)
Total Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Total AUC estimated by AUC 0-48h plus an area extrapolated from the log-linear regression model
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic evaluations: 30 minutes pre-infusion up to 48 hours post-infusion
Area Under the Curve
Area under the factor VIII (FVIII) plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from 0 to 48 hours estimated using the linear trapezoidal method
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic evaluations: 30 minutes pre-infusion up to 48 hours post-infusion
Maximum Plasma Concentration (C-max)
Maximal Factor VIII Concentration After Infusion
Time frame: Within 1 hour post-infusion
Adjusted Incremental Recovery (IR)
Change in factor VIII concentration from pre- to post-infusion at initial and termination study visits. Adjusted IR defined as: \[Cmax (IU/dL) - pre-infusion FVIII (IU/dL)\]/dose (IU/kg)
Time frame: 30 minutes pre-infusion to 48 hours post-infusion
Terminal Half-life
Computed from the regression slope in the terminal phase of the model. Terminal half life is the time it takes for the plasma concentration or the amount of drug in the body to be reduced by 50%.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic evaluations: 30 minutes pre-infusion up to 48 hours post-infusion
Weight-Adjusted Clearance
Computed as the weight-adjusted dose divided by total AUC
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic evaluations: 30 minutes pre-infusion up to 48 hours post-infusion
Mean Residence Time
Computed as total Area Under the Moment Curve (AUMC) divided by the total AUC
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic evaluations: 30 minutes pre-infusion up to 48 hours post-infusion
Volume of Distribution at Steady State
Computed as weight-adjusted clearance \* mean residence time
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic evaluations: 30 minutes pre-infusion up to 48 hours post-infusion
Factor VIII Inhibitor Development
Number of treated participants who developed factor VIII inhibitors
Time frame: Throughout study period (4 years and 5 months)
Number of Participants With AEs Related to Investigational Product (IP)
Number of treated participants with AEs judged to be possibly or probably related to treatment with IP
Time frame: Throughout study period (4 years and 5 months)
Number of Participants Who Reported ≥1 AE Regardless of Relatedness to Investigational Product (IP)
Number of treated participants with 1 or more AE regardless of relatedness to IP
Time frame: Throughout study period (4 years and 5 months)
Number of Participants Who Reported ≥1 AE Regardless of Relatedness to IP by Treatment Regimen
Time frame: Throughout the study period (4 years and 5 months)
Number of Participants With SAEs by Preferred MedDRA Term and Treatment Regimen
Time frame: Throughout the study period (4 years and 5 months)
AEs With Onset ≤1 Hour Following the End of an Infusion, Regardless of Relatedness
Time frame: Throughout study period (4 years and 5 months)
Number of Participants With Severe SAEs and Severe Non-SAEs by Preferred MedDRA Term and Treatment Regimen
This outcome is focused only on SEVERE SAEs and SEVERE non-SAEs
Time frame: Throughout the study period (4 years and 5 months)
Baseline Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Scores: PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE, MH, PCS, and MCS
Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Baseline SF-36v1 Scores, where data available. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: Baseline
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Scores: PF, RP, BP, GH, VT, SF, RE, MH, PCS, and MCS at the End of Treatment Regimens
Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Baseline SF-36v1 Scores, where data available. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: End of on-demand treatment period (6 months) and at study termination (approximately 18 months)
HRQoL Scores Change From On-Demand Treatment Regimen Period Through Prophylaxis Period
Differences in health domain scores = (End of on-demand treatment) - (End of prophylaxis regimen). A negative value for the median difference equates to a larger domain score for the prophylaxis regimen Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Time frame: End of on-demand treatment period (6 months) and at study termination (approximately 18 months)
Bodily Pain HRQoL Scores Change From On-Demand Period Through Prophylaxis Period
Change = (End of on-demand treatment) - (End of prophylaxis regimen). A negative value for the median difference equates to a larger domain score for the prophylaxis regimen. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores.
Time frame: End of on-demand treatment period (6 months) and at study termination (approximately 18 months)
Physical Component Scores (PCS) HRQoL Scores Change From On-Demand Period Through Prophylaxis Period
Change = (End of on-demand treatment) - (End of prophylaxis regimen) A negative value for the median difference equates to a larger domain score for the prophylaxis regimen. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores.
Time frame: End of on-demand treatment period (6 months) and at study termination (approximately 18 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.