RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vinorelbine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving radiation therapy together with vinorelbine and cisplatin is more effective than radiation therapy alone in treating non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying how well giving radiation therapy together with vinorelbine and cisplatin works and compares it to radiation therapy alone in treating patients with stage I, stage II, or stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the overall survival of patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer treated with vinorelbine, cisplatin, and continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) vs CHART alone. Secondary * Compare the response, progression-free survival, and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the toxic effect of these regimens in these patients. * Compare the cost effectiveness of these regimens in these patients. * Compare the local and distant control in patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) 3 times a day for 12 consecutive days. * Arm II: Patients receive vinorelbine IV over 5-10 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 4-6 weeks later, patients undergo CHART as in arm I. Quality of life is assessed periodically. After completion of study treatment, patients are evaluated periodically for at least 5 years. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 500 patients will be accrued for this study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
500
Wansbeck General Hospital
Ashington, England, United Kingdom
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, United Kingdom
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
Derby, England, United Kingdom
University Hospital of North Durham
Durham, England, United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Gateshead, England, United Kingdom
Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment at Newcastle General Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, United Kingdom
Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust
Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
Kings Mill Hospital
Nottinghamshire, England, United Kingdom
...and 10 more locations
Overall survival
Progression-free survival
Toxicity
Response (complete or partial response)
Cost effectiveness
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.