The purpose of this prospective database is to investigate the long-term functional status of patients who have undergone various types of rotator cuff repair surgery. Patients are asked to respond to questionnaires prior to surgery and at various post-operative visits in an attempt to quantify their functional outcomes. Responses are then linked to other data such as symptoms, prior treatments, previous surgery, complications, radiographic results, etc. These data may then be used as a basis for devising guidelines for future patients and surgeons. This particular project is interested in investigating long term results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques.
The purpose of the prospective database is to initiate data collection for a group of patients undergoing surgery of the shoulder. Long-term data collection will include information on the functional status of the patients' shoulder as well as quality of life information and radiographic results. For the purposes of this study, we are interested in the long-term outcomes of participants who underwent a double row versus single row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
90
Fixation type in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Fixation type in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a disease specific evaluation, proven to be an accurate and valid assessment of function after. The WORC is a patient-reported measure, 21-question survey. Each question is measured using a visual analog scale rated from 0-100, where higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: 10 year post operative
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
The ASES is a shoulder specific assessment divided into two sections: pain and activities of daily living (ADL). Pain is recorded on a visual analogue scale (0-10), lower scores indicate better outcomes. There are 10 activities of daily living questions, each are recorded on a 4 level likert scale (0-3), which a higher score indicates a better outcome. The overall score is an equal weight of the two sections and produces a score out of 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: 10 year post operative
Constant Score
The Constant Score reflects an overall clinical functional assessment. This instrument is based on a 100-point scoring system. Subjective findings (pain, activities of daily living, and working in different positions) make up a total of 35 points. Objective measurements make up the remaining 65 points.The test is divided into four sub-categories: (1) pain is measured using 4 likert levels (15 points maximum), where a higher score indicates a better outcome; activities of daily living are measured using a likert scale, where a higher number indicates better outcomes (20 points maximum); mobility is measured by an assessor, and rated using a likert scale where a higher score indicates better outcomes (40 points maximum); finally, strength is measured by an assessor where 1 point is given per 0.5kg of force (maximum 25 points), a higher score indicates better outcomes. All categories are added together, and a total score out of 100 is given (higher score indicates better outcome).
Time frame: 10 year post operative
Strength
Strength will be measured using a handheld dynamometer in the abduction position which records kilograms of force. The higher the kilogram of force indicates a better result.
Time frame: 10 year post operative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.