Regenafil Versus Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) for Periodontal Defects

RTI Surgical40 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this research study was to determine whether treatment with the bone grafting material Regenafil was as effective as the standard treatment using demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA). Regenafil is demineralized freeze dried bone in a special gel form.

To compare the regenerative effects of a demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) particulate in a biologic thermoplastic carrier (Regenafil) to the standard of care. To compare the regenerative effects of a demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) particulate in the treatment of intraosseous vertical defects following six months of healing. This was accomplished by evaluating clinical parameters including probing depth, attachment level and bleeding upon probing, using attachment level as the primary outcome variable. Treatment of the vertical osseous defect is a challenging problem in periodontics. There are many treatment options including: 1. open flap debridement; 2. osseous graft alone; 3. membrane alone; 4. or membrane plus an osseous graft. Choice of treatment may depend on the defect depth and configuration. A shallow, narrow 3 wall defect may respond well to open flap debridement while a deep 2 wall defect may need regenerative therapy such as an osseous graft, a membrane or combined membrane and graft treatment. Studies of vertical defect therapy with defects about 4 mm or greater show that similar percent defect fill results are obtained with regenerative therapies. Open flap debridement produces substantially less percent defect fill.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Interventions

DFDBAOTHER

Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft bone

RegenafilDEVICE

Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone in a porcine gel carrier

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Provide written informed consent prior to their participation. 2. Be an adult age 18 and older. 3. Have at least a 4 mm open vertical osseous defect depth on one tooth, visible on a radiograph and with a probing depth ≥ 5 mm. 4. Have osseous defects that are either wide 3-wall, or combination defects. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Have debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that affect the periodontium. 2. Have a known allergy to any of the materials that will be used in the study: * non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) * chlorhexidine digluconate * doxycycline * gelatin 3. Need prophylactic antibiotics. 4. Have a vertical osseous defect that is related to a furcation area. 5. Smoke more than 1 pack per day. 6. Have endodontically treated teeth or endodontic lesions at study sites. 7. Have 1-wall defects. 8. Have poor oral hygiene. 9. Have anterior fillings (Note: if a subject presents with anterior fillings, it will be at the discretion of the principal investigator as to whether they should be accepted into the study.) 10. Be pregnant as evidenced by a positive urine pregnancy test taken at both the screening and baseline visits.

Locations (2)

Indiana University School of Dentistry

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

University of Louisville School of Dentistry

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Probing Depth

This is the distance, measured in millimeters (mm) from the gingival margin to the maximal penetration of the probe tip. The measures were made at baseline and then at 6 months after treatment.

Time frame: baseline and then at 6 months

Clinical Attachment Level

The amount of space between attached periodontal tissues and a fixed point, usually the cementoenamel junction. A measurement used to assess the stability of attachment as part of a periodontal maintenance program.

Time frame: 6 months

Recession

CEJ to gingival margin (GM). GM coronal to the CEJ were scored as a negative number.

Time frame: 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

Gingival Index

Scores: 0 Normal gingiva 1. Mild inflammation 2. Moderate inflammation 3. Severe inflammation Gingival units (buccal, lingual, mesiobuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, and distolingual) of each tooth were scored 0-3. Scores from the 6 areas of the tooth were added and divided by 6 to give the gingival index for the entire tooth.

Time frame: 6 months

Plaque Index

0- No plaque 1. A film of plaque adhering to gingival margin \& adjacent area of tooth 2. Moderate accumulation of soft deposits, visible with the naked eye 3. Abundance of soft matter Each gingival region of the individual tooth will be scored 0-3 The scores from the 6 areas of the tooth are averaged to give the plaque index for the tooth.

Time frame: 6 months

Bleeding on Probing

The variable measured the presence of bleeding when the osseus defect was probed. The presence and character of gingival bleeding will be determined by gently probing to the base of the pockets. 0 - No bleeding. 1 - Bleeding when probing.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.