The purpose of the study is to understand the relationship between what an individual inherited from their family (genetics), how they respond and feel after drinking alcohol, and how they respond to pre-treatment with naltrexone, a medication that blocks some of the effects of alcohol and is approved for the treatment of alcoholism. The investigators are conducting this study on those of African descent because there is almost no research focused on this group and the association with genetics. The investigators seek to enroll 40 people in the study. Participation will consist of 4 different alcohol challenge sessions in a cross over design. Each session will be separated by at least 10 days. In total, there will be four challenge sessions.
We propose to test the degree to which specific genetic markers alter the relationship between subjective and objective measures of response to alcohol ingestion among non-alcohol dependent adults of African descent in a laboratory environment. To meet this aim, non-alcohol dependent adults of African descent will be recruited for participation to meet the N-goal of 40 trial completers. After consenting, genotyping, and completing the baseline assessment, they will participate in four separate alcohol challenge sessions separated by at least 10 days. During each of the sessions, subjects will be administered alcohol or sham drinking challenge sessions and pretreatment with either naltrexone (50 mg/day) or placebo in a double-blind fashion. The order of the four sessions will be randomly assigned. During each session, physiological and subjective response will be measured. We will select subjects to assure equal number of participants with at least one copy of the Val6 allele compared to those homozygous for the Ala6 allele.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
43
50 mg/day for two days prior to the alcohol challenge session
placebo pills
190 proof alcohol prepared to 11% volume mixed with fruit juice.
non-alcoholic placebo alcohol
University of Pennsylvania Treatment Research Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale - Stimulation
Change from baseline to peak for the feeling of stimulation after alcohol ingestion Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale - Stimulation: sum of 7 items each rated on 11 point Likert scale (0=not at all, 10=extremely). Minimum=0, maximum=70, higher scores=worse outcome.
Time frame: During challenge sessions
Profile of Mood States - Vigor
Change from baseline to peak for the amount of Vigor experienced after alcohol ingestion Profile of Mood States - Vigor: sum of 6 items each rated on 5 point Likert scale (0: not at all, 4: extremely). Minimum=0, maximum=20, higher scores = better outcome
Time frame: during the challenge session
Subjective High From Alcohol Scale
Change from baseline to peak for the self reported feeling of being high after drinking Subjective High from Alcohol Scale: sum of 15 items rated on a 8 point Likert scale (0-7). Minimum=0, maximum=105, higher scores=worse outcomes
Time frame: during the alcohol ingestion
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale - Sedation
Change from baseline to peak of the amount of sedation post ingestion of alcohol Biphasic alcohol effects scale - Sedation: sum of 7 items rated on 11 point Likert scale (0=not at all, 10=extremely). Minimum=0, maximum=70, lower scores=worse outcomes
Time frame: During the challenge session
Profile of Mood States - Fatigue Scale
Change from baseline to peak of the degree of fatigue experienced after alcohol ingestion Profile of Mood States - Fatigue scale: sum of 5 items rated on 5-point Likert scale (0=not at all, 4=extremely). Minimum=0, maximum=20, higher score=worse outcome
Time frame: During the challenge session
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.