This study evaluates the effect of medicines for type 2 diabetes and lipids control. This study will require about 6 office visits for lab tests and examinations. All study related medicines and medical examinations will be provided at no cost to the subjects.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
369
Median Percent Change From Baseline to Week 6 in LDL-c in FDC and RSG Monotherapy
Median percent change from Baseline to Week 6 in LDL-c in FDC and RSG monotherapy was reported. Percent change from Baseline = 100\*(exponent \[change on log scale\]-1). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available. The hypothesis of treatment difference was tested at a 0.05 significance level based on two-sided tests. The point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for treatment differences was calculated. Treatment differences were assessed within the context of an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with terms for treatment, gender, current sulfonylurea use (at baseline), country, and Baseline measurement. ANCOVA for LDL-c were performed based on log-transformed data.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 6
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in FDC and SIMV Monotherapy
Mean change from Baseline to Week 16 in HbA1c in FDC and SIMV monotherapy was reported. Change from Baseline was computed as (Visit value - Baseline value). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available. The hypothesis of treatment difference was tested at a 0.05 significance level based on two-sided tests. The point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for treatment differences was calculated. Treatment differences were assessed within the context of ANCOVA with terms for treatment, gender, current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline), country, and Baseline measurement.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Median Percent Change From Baseline to Week 6 in LDL-c
Percent change from Baseline = 100\*(exponent \[change on log scale\]-1). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fresno, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Cloud, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Melrose Park, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Illinois, United States
...and 75 more locations
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in HbA1c
Change from Baseline was computed as (Visit value - Baseline value). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Change from Baseline was computed as (Visit value - Baseline value). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Number of Participant With LDL<100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 6
Number of participants achieving American Diabetes Association (ADA) target of LDL\<100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 6 was compared between the FDC groups and the all SIMV group using logistic regression with terms for treatment, Baseline value, gender and current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline) in the model.
Time frame: Week 6
Number of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0% or Reduction of HbA1c ≥ 0.7% at Week 16
Number of participants achieving ADA target of HbA1c \< 7.0% or reduction of HbA1c ≥ 0.7% at Week 16 was compared between the FDC groups and the RSG groups groups using logistic regression with terms for treatment, Baseline value, gender and current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline) in the model.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Number of Participants With FPG< 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or Reduction of FPG ≥ 30 mg/dL (1.67 mmol/L) at Week 16
Number of participants achieving ADA target of FPG\< 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or reduction of FPG ≥ 30 mg/dL (1.67 mmol/L) at Week 16 was compared between the all SIM monotherapy group and the all FDC RSG/SIMV groups using logistic regression with terms for treatment, Baseline value, gender and current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline) in the model.
Time frame: Week 16
On-Therapy Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern Including Systolic, Diastolic Blood Pressure and Heart Rate
The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (\<85 and \>160 millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\]), diastolic blood pressure (\<45 and \>100 mmHg) and heart rate (\<40 and \>110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
On-Therapy Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available. Change from Baseline was computed as: Visit value - Baseline Value.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Specified Ranges of Red and White Blood Cell Counts Detected in Urine
Urine samples were observed for red blood cells and white blood cells. the results were reported as cells per high-power field (cells/HPF). The number of participants with cells in urine were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE include AEs those result in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Number of of Participants With Laboratory Evaluations of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Time Post-baseline
The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, chloride, calcium, total protein, albumin, creatinine total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase. The hematology parameters analyzed were hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, total white cell count. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important hematology findings at any visit were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 16