We wish to determine wich of two standardized suturing techniques is the best for perineal repair if a perineal laceration or an episiotomy is present after vaginal birth. The participants are healthy primi para and deliver at term.
A randomised controlled trial with 400 participants was initiated in August 2004. The two suture techniques compared were both 2-layered and either continuous sutures or interrupted, inverted stitches to perineal muscles and the subcuticular layer. A polyglactin 910 multifilament thread on an atraumatic needle was used and the perineal skin was left unsutured. Healthy primiparas \>36+0 weeks gestation could participate if they had a either a 2nd degree perineal laceration or an episiotomy. The trial was a double-blind and analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis. Main outcomes were pain, wound healing and patient satisfaction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
400
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skejby Sygehus
Aarhus, Denmark
Pain in perineal area day 1 and 10 after delivery.
Healing of wound day 1 and 10 after delivery.
Patient satisfaction with perineal sutures performed at birth.
Incontinence.
Need for resuturing of perineal area within 1 year after delivery.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.