The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of two types of chiropractic spinal manipulation to conservative medical care for patients at least 55 years old with sub-acute or chronic LBP.
Despite the high prevalence of LBP and the associated economic costs, disability, and lost productivity, and despite the development of several treatment guidelines, one of which recommends chiropractic spinal manipulation for some subgroups of patients with back pain, the management of LBP remains controversial and highly variable across professions and geographic regions. Although one recent publication describes the design of chiropractic and exercise for seniors with low back or neck pain, no published studies, to our knowledge, have assessed the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation compared to medical care for older adults with sub-acute or chronic low back pain.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
192
HVLA-SM, Experimental, high-velocity low amplitude spinal manipulation
LVVA-SM, Experimental, low velocity variable amplitude spinal manipulation
Arm: Active Comparator: Usual Medical Care Usual Medical Care, Active Comparator, advice, exercises and medications (Celebrex, Aleve, Bextra, Naptoxen)
Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Roland Morris Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
The RMDQ is a widely used health status measure for low back pain. Scoring of the RMDQ ranges from 0-24, with a higher score indicating an increase in low back pain disability. This outcome displays the mean change in RMDQ from baseline to week 3.
Time frame: Mean change from baseline to week 3
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.