HYPOTHESIS 1. Sealing moderate SVG lesions with the TAXUS stent prevents SVG atherosclerosis progression as evaluated by IVUS. 2. Sealing moderate SVG lesions with the TAXUS stent does not accelerate SVG atherosclerosis in the angiographically non-diseased segments of the SVG as evaluated by IVUS. OBJECTIVES 1. To determine the effect of stenting moderate SVG lesions with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in comparison with medical treatment on limiting SVG disease progression as evaluated by IVUS. 2. To evaluate by IVUS the effect of stenting moderate SVG lesions with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in comparison with medical treatment on atherosclerosis progression in angiographically non-diseased SVGs segments.
This will be a prospective randomized study assessing the efficacy of stenting moderate SVG lesions with the taxus stent in the prevention of atherosclerosis progression of SVGs as evaluated by IVUS. Patients with previous coronary bypass surgery with SVG implantation undergoing coronary angiography by clinical indication will be screened. If the patient has a moderate lesion at any level of the SVGs it will be includable in the study. After inclusion, the patients will be randomized to either stenting the moderate SVG lesion with the taxus stent or standard medical treatment. The use of a filter wire during dilation will be strongly recommended. Following this procedure, all patients will have clinical controls at 1 month and at 6 months and an angiographic and IVUS control study at 1 year follow-up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
57
Patients are randomized to either stenting the moderate SVG lesion with the paclitaxel stent or standard medical treatment
Laval Hospital
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Ultrasound lumen area and minimal lumen diameter at follow-up at the tomographic section showing the most severe stenosis, comparing stented vs medically treated SVGs lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Change between baseline and follow-up in ultrasound lumen area and minimal lumen diameter (% and absolute value) at the tomographic section showing the most severe stenosis, comparing stented vs medically treated SVGs lesions
Time frame: 12 months
Change in atheroma volume (% and absolute value) as evaluated by IVUS between baseline and follow-up in an angiographically non-diseased 40 mm segment (excluding the target lesion), comparing stented vs medically treated SVGs
Time frame: 12 months
Cumulative incidence of clinical events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: 12 months
SVG occlusion rate, lesion/stent late loss, minimal lumen diameter, and % diameter stenosis as assessed by angiography at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.