The purpose of the study is to compare remote pacemaker follow-up to current standard of care follow-up. The study will compare the rate of first diagnosis of clinically actionable events between patients who utilize the Medtronic Carelink® Network (Remote arm) versus patients who are followed via routine office visits augmented by transtelephonic monitoring (TTM)(Control arm).
The Clinically Actionable Events (CAE) were identified based on their relation to other comorbidities that may increase the risk of a serious cardiac event. The defined events are: 1. Atrial Tachycardia/Atrial Fibrillation (AT/AF) episodes of greater than 48 hours defined as two consecutive days in which the device records at least 18 hours of AT/AF per day 2. Ventricular pacing that has increased by 30 percent (relative) since the last device interrogation 3. A sensed ventricular response of greater than 100 beats per minute (BPM) during atrial tachyarrhythmia for at least 20 percent of the time since the previous device interrogation 4. Runs of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) greater than 5 beats 5. New onset of AT/AF among patients with no history of AT/AF 6. Loss of atrial capture 7. Loss of ventricular capture 8. Increase in atrial pacing voltage threshold greater than 1 volt (V) 9. Increase in ventricular pacing voltage threshold greater than 1 volt (V) 10. \& 11. Significant change in atrial or ventricular lead impedance, defined as any of the following: 1. Less than 200 or greater than 2000 ohms (Ω) 2. Unstable lead impedance deemed to be clinically actionable 3. Greater than 50 percent change in lead impedance since last interrogation 12\. Elective Replacement Indicator (ERI)/Battery End of Life (EOL) indicators
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
980
TTM conducted at 2 month intervals. For patients with dual-chamber pacemakers, an in-office visit was required at 6 months (rather than TTM transmission for patients with single-chamber pacemakers). Follow-up frequency established to mimic best case standard of care when utilizing TTM for follow-up. A 12-month in-office visit completed the follow-up period.
Remote pacemaker interrogation conducted at 3 month intervals. Follow-up frequency established to mimic best case standard of care when utilizing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) remote interrogation for follow-up. A 12-month in-office visit completed the follow-up period.
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Clinically Actionable Events (CAE) at 12 Months
Clinically Actionable Events (CAE) are 12 events that were identified based on their relation to other comorbidities that may increase the risk of a serious cardiac event. The CAEs consist of several arrhythmias and device performance parameters such as: Atrial Tachycardia/Atrial Fibrillation (AT/AF) and loss of capture.
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Proportion of Actions Taken in Response to the Diagnosis of Clinically Actionable Events
Actions categories include: Referral, Office Visit, Medication (Med) Change, Hospitalization, Emergency Room (ER) Visit, Device Reprogrammed, System Modification, Increase Monitoring, Other
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of New Onset Atrial Tachycardia/Atrial Fibrillation (AT/AF) at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Remote and Control arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Sensed Ventricular Rate Greater Than 100 Beats Per Minute (BPM) During Atrial Tachycardia/Atrial Fibrillation at 12 Months
Compare time to diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Atrial Tachycardia/Atrial Fibrillation Greater Than 48 Hours at 12 Months
Compare time to diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Ventricular Pacing Increase Greater Than 30 Percent at 12 Months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Unnamed facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unnamed facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Unnamed facility
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Safety Harbor, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Unnamed facility
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Unnamed facility
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
Unnamed facility
Bangor, Maine, United States
Unnamed facility
Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
...and 35 more locations
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Non-sustained Ventricular Tachycardia at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Loss of Atrial Capture at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Loss of Ventricular Capture at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Remote and Control arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With an Increase in Atrial Pacing Voltage Threshold Greater Than 1 Volt (V) at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Remote and Control arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With an Increase in Ventricular Pacing Voltage Threshold Greater Than 1 Volt (V) at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Change in Atrial Lead Impedance at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Change in Ventricular Lead Impedance at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment
Percentage of Participants With First Diagnosis of Elective Replacement Indicator/Battery End of Life (ERI/EOL) at 12 Months
Compare time to first diagnosis in Control and Remote arms
Time frame: One year post-enrollment