Osteoarthritis of both the knee and hip joints are common conditions; knee osteoarthritis affects 6% of adults over 30 years of age and osteoarthritis of the hip affects between 3% and 6% of the Caucasian population. Both forms of osteoarthritis are associated with disability. Conventional treatment (analgesics and the use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, NSAIDS) is prophylactic, aimed at decreasing pain and improving function. However long term use of NSAIDS is associated with a high incidence of adverse events (gastrointestinal tract symptoms). A safer alternative treatment would therefore be beneficial. Both anecdotal evidence and recent studies have implicated the potential of the herbal remedy Devil's Claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) for the treatment of painful, chronic arthritic type conditions (Ernst and Chrubasik, 2000). Devil's Claw is an extract obtained from the root of the Harpagophytum procumbens plant, a member of the sesame family found in the Kalahari region in South Africa. It has been shown that this herbal remedy has anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects (Baghdikian et al, 1997). Currently Devil's Claw is marketed for use as a supportive treatment of degenerative arthrosis, is not a Medicines Control Agency licensed product and is freely available to the general public in health food stores and pharmacies. The objectives of this study are to assess the efficacy, optimum dosage and safety of the herbal remedy Devil's Claw (Harpagophytum) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the following three principal questions: 1. To compare the efficacy of Devil's Claw with placebo in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip 2. To determine the optimum dose of Devil's Claw and 3. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of three doses of Devil's Claw in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee/hip and to compare them to placebo There are also a number of secondary research objectives that will also be addressed (see later). These objectives are based on the following hypotheses : Hypotheses * Devil's Claw has anti-inflammatory properties (as assessed by the reduction in pain, stiffness and disability aspects on the WOMAC) in chronic osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip after 16 weeks of treatment, as compared to placebo. * A dose response effect exists in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee/hip by Devil's Claw.
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging two-centre study PREPARATIONS FOR INVESTIGATION: Devil's Claw (Allya®)/placebo as tablets STATISTICAL METHODS: Analysis on an intention to treat basis. The following tests will be performed and all statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05: Primary efficacy analysis: The primary outcome will be the reduction in WOMAC total score from baseline to week 16. The week 16 means for the four treatment groups will be compared using an analysis of covariance taking account of baseline assessments and any demographic differences, age, gender, etc, which are found to be significant. Multiple comparison tests will be used to examine specific differences of initially specified interest, such as the two highest doses of Devil's Claw versus placebo. Secondary Efficacy Analysis: Similar analyses of covariance will be used to examine treatment group differences at week 16 compared with baseline for WOMAC subscales (pain, stiffness and physical function), and Quality of Life assessments (SF-36). Changes in the subject's well-being and overall global assessment will be compared using appropriate non-parametric tests, e.g. Mann-Whitney test or MacNemar's test. Changes in attitudes and health beliefs to CAM will be assessed using Chi-Squared tests. Safety Evaluation: Group differences between adverse event reporting will be assessed by descriptive methods. NUMBER OF PATIENTS: 264 (50 patients in each group, with an expected total of 64 drop-outs) NUMBER OF SITES: 2 TIME SCHEDULE: Study Start: April 2004 Study End: March 2007 Observation period/patient: 20 weeks
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
67
Dose ranging study so will elucidate dose Frequency is four times daily
Placebo has same dosing freq as for active intervention and for same time period
Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, Hants, United Kingdom
Western Ontario and Mc Master University OA Index (WOMAC)
WOMAC is a disease specific outcome measure for osteoarthritis. It has three subscales assessing pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions) and function (15 questions). together the subscales give an overall total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best; an increase in total score indicates an improvement in health. THe outcome was measured at baseline, week 8 and week 16. In this study the primary outcome was the reduction in WOMAC total score from baseline to the end of treatment at week 16.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Pain Subscale on Western Ontario and Mc Master University OA Index
Subscale assessed by 100mm VAS based on five questions addressing pain in osteoarthritis using the terminators no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). a higher score therefore indicates more severe pain. This outcome was recorded at baseline, week 8 and week 16 (end of treatment). The outcome for this study was reported as the change in WOMAC pain score from baseline to end of treatment at week 16.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Disability Subscale on The Western Ontario and Mc Master University OA Index
Subscale assessed by 100mm VAS based on twelve questions addressing disability in osteoarthritis with a higher score indicating worse symptoms. The VAS used terminators of no disability (0mm) to extreme disability (100mm). The measure was recorded at baseline, week 8 and week 16. We reported the outcome as the change from baseline to end of treatment at week 16.
Time frame: baseline, 8 and 16 weeks
Stiffness Subscale on the The Western Ontario and Mc Master University OA Index
Subscale assessed by 100mm VAS based on two questions addressing stiffness in osteoarthritis;a higher score indicating worse symptoms. The VAS used terminators of no stiffness (0mm) to extreme stiffness (100mm). The measure was recorded at baseline, week 8 and week 16. We reported the outcome as the change from baseline to end of treatment at week 16.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Quality of Life assessment containing 8 scales clustered into 2 summary scales: physical health and mental health. Each question is scored out from 0 (indicating worst health) to 100 (indicating best health). Mean scores for the 8 scales (total scores/no questions completed) are calculated to give a total score for each of the two summary scales between 0 (worst health) and 100 (best health). SF36 was recorded at baseline, week 8 and at the end of treatment at week 16. we reported the change from baseline to end of treatment as the outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Patient Global Assessment
To assess changes in the subject's well-being based on 7 point likert scale ranging from very poor (0 point) to very good (7 point). Outcome was recorded at baseline, week 8 and end of treatment at week 16. We reported outcome as the change in patient global assessment from baseline to end of treatment at week 16.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 and week 16
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Beliefs Inventory
Questionnaire to assess changes in attitudes and health beliefs to CAM.the questionnaire as 17 questions, each scored on a 7 point likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree; a higher score indicates stronger belief in the measure. Minimum score 17, maximum score 119
Time frame: four monthly
Adverse Event Reporting
To identify Group differences between the number of adverse event recorded by patient for both serious and non serious adverse events, as well as events considered being attributable to the study medication.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 2,4,6,8,12 and 16
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.