The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and safety of rituximab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) and etanercept or adalimumab in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The secondary objective was to explore the efficacy of rituximab in combination with MTX and etanercept or adalimumab in participants with active RA.
The study consists of 4 parts: screening, treatment, post-treatment, and safety follow-up. Prior to Day 1, participants were discontinued from all disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) except MTX and etanercept or adalimumab. All participants who met eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the trial were randomized to receive 500 mg rituximab or placebo on Day 1 and Day 15. A subset of 18 participants was enrolled initially and followed through Week 12 for safety. The remaining 42 participants were to be enrolled after the last participant in the subset completed Week 12 and the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) conducted a safety review and approved enrollment of these additional participants. Participants were dosed on Day 1 and Day 15 and followed for 56 weeks, while remaining on their current dose of MTX and etanercept or adalimumab throughout the study. The primary endpoint was assessed at Week 24. All participants in double-blind treatment, including those who received placebo or rituximab, who met the open label inclusion/exclusion criteria anytime from Week 24 through Week 40, were eligible to enter the open label retreatment phase. These participants received open label rituximab on Day 1 and Day 15 of the retreatment phase, and were followed monthly until Week 24 then every 2 months until Week 56, while remaining on their current dose of MTX and etanercept or adalimumab throughout the study. Participants received 1 course of open label treatment only. All participants were required to return for safety follow-up (SFU) assessments at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 after withdrawal or completion of the study. Participants whose peripheral CD20+ B cells remained depleted at the end of the SFU periods for the primary and OL portions of the study entered extended safety follow-up (ESFU). Assessments for ESFU were performed at 12-week intervals until peripheral B-cell levels returned to within normal range or baseline level (whichever was lower).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
54
Participants will receive 500 mg rituximab on Day 1 and Day 15
Participants will receive placebo on Day 1 and Day 15
Participants must have been treated with MTX ≥15 mg per week and ≤25 mg per week (dose may have been as low as 10 mg if unable to tolerate higher dose) for at least 12 weeks immediately prior to Day 1, at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks and was continued for the study duration.
Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Research Site
Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States
Proportion of Participants With at Least One Serious Infection Through Week 24
An infection was considered serious if it required intravenous (IV) antibiotics or met the regulatory definition of a serious adverse event (SAE). An SAE was any event that resulted in death, resulted in a congenital anomaly in a child of a participant in the study, caused or prolonged an inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant or persistent disability, or was considered by the investigator to be an important medical event that may have required intervention to prevent any of the above-listed outcomes.
Time frame: Through Week 24
Number of Participants With Any Infections or Any Grade 3/4 Infections Through Week 24
Infections were defined as adverse events that map to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class (SOC) of "infections and infestations" and also included other infectious events that do not map to this SOC (e.g., cholecystitis, pleurisy, conjunctivitis, acne, tongue ulceration). Participants with multiple infections were calculated only once. The severity of all reported adverse events, including infections, was graded and reported according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. This scale defines the severity of an adverse event as follows: Grade 1 = a mild adverse event, Grade 2 = a moderate adverse event, Grade 3 = a severe adverse event, and Grade 4 = a life-threatening or disabling adverse event.
Time frame: Through Week 24
Maximum Duration of Infections Through Week 24
Infections were defined as adverse events that map to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class (SOC) of "infections and infestations" and also included other infectious events that do not map to this SOC (e.g., cholecystitis, pleurisy, conjunctivitis, acne, tongue ulceration). For participants with multiple infections, only the infection with the longest duration was included in this analysis.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through Week 24
An AE was any sign (including an abnormal laboratory result that the investigator determined to be clinically significant), symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that was new, or if pre-existing, worsened in a participant and that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any event that resulted in death, resulted in a congenital anomaly in a child of a participant in the study, caused or prolonged an inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant or persistent disability, or was considered by the investigator to be an important medical event that may have required intervention to prevent any of the above-listed outcomes.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Participants must have been treated with etanercept at 50 mg per week (25 mg twice per week or 50 mg once per week).
Participants must have been treated with adalimumab at 40 mg every other week for at least 12 weeks immediately prior to Day 1.
Methylprednisolone 100 mg IV was administered by slow infusion to be completed at least 30 minutes prior to each infusion of rituximab or placebo.
All subjects also received a stable dose of folate (≥5 mg per week).
Research Site
Palm Desert, California, United States
Research Site
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Research Site
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Research Site
Boise, Idaho, United States
Research Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Research site
Chardon, Ohio, United States
Research Site
Mayfield Village, Ohio, United States
...and 8 more locations
Time frame: Through Week 24
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Immunological and Laboratory Assessment Findings
The following immunological assessments were conducted: autoantibody concentrations for RF, anti-cyclic-citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody concentrations, quantitative immunoglobulin levels, and lymphocyte assessments of T- and B-cell populations, determined using whole blood expanded fluorescent-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. The following laboratory assessments were performed: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC) with differential, and platelet counts; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid, creatinine, random glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorous; blood, protein, and glucose (microscopic examination, if abnormal and applicable).
Time frame: Through Week 24
Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24
An ACR20 response is defined as a 20% reduction in the number of both swollen and tender joints, and a 20% reduction in the score or results of at least 3 of the following 5 core set measurement tools: Patient and physician assessment of patient disease activity (DA) in previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, no DA to maximum DA); patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (none to unbearable); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and C reactive protein or, if missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response at Week 24
An ACR50 response is defined as a 50% reduction in the number of both swollen and tender joints, and a 50% reduction in the score or results of at least 3 of the following 5 core set measurement tools: Patient and physician assessment of patient disease activity (DA) in previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, no DA to maximum DA); patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (none to unbearable); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and C reactive protein or, if missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response at Week 24
An ACR70 response is defined as a 70% reduction in the number of both swollen and tender joints, and a 70% reduction in the score or results of at least 3 of the following 5 core set measurement tools: Patient and physician assessment of patient disease activity (DA) in previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, no DA to maximum DA); patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (none to unbearable); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and C reactive protein or, if missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Time frame: Week 24