The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with rituximab plus sargramostim will be more effective than rituximab alone.
On 29 May 2009, Bayer began transitioning the sponsorship of this trial to Genzyme. As of 29 August 2009, Genzyme assumed responsibility for the close out of the study. NOTE: This study was originally posted by sponsor Berlex, Inc. Berlex, Inc. was renamed to Bayer HealthCare, Inc. The study was terminated early due to low enrollment; significant changes to the protocol would have been required to keep pace with the changing therapeutic landscape of indolent lymphoma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Sargramostim 250 μg, administered subcutaneously (SC) 3 times weekly for 8 weeks, beginning at least 1 hour before the first dose of rituximab
Four doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2, administered intravenously (IV) once weekly for 4 weeks
Unnamed facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unnamed facility
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Number of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12
Count of number of participants who responded with a Complete Response (complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiological evidence of disease) at week 8 and again clinically and radiologically confirmed at week 12.
Time frame: Week 8 (confirmed at Week 12)
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Count of the number of participants who experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs occurred during the time study intervention was being taken occurring on or after Day 1 and no longer than 30 days after the last dose of study medication.
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Participant Summary of Best Response Across All Visits
Count of participants' best response within categories defined by the International Working Group (IWG): \> Complete Response (complete disappearance of detectable clinical and radiological evidence of disease), \> Complete Response Unconfirmed (unconfirmed complete disappearance), \> Partial Response (\>=50% decrease sum of the product of the greatest diameters in the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses), \> Stable Disease (neither response nor disease progression), \> Progression (new lesion or increase by 50% of previously involved sites from nadir).
Time frame: up to 24 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival
Time to event was measured from the date of randomization to the date of first progressive disease (PD) or death.
Time frame: 24 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Partial Response or Better to Treatment
Count of days in which a participant experiences a Partial Response (\>=50% decrease sum of the product of the greatest diameters in the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses) or better. Time to event was measured from the date of response to the date of progressive disease (PD) or death.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Montebello, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Pleasant Hill, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Ocala, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unnamed facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
...and 12 more locations
Time frame: 24 months
Summary of Cost Effectiveness
A cost-effectiveness analysis from the payer perspective was to be performed. Only direct medical costs for each patient during the study period were to be included for analysis. Costs were to be calculated by multiplying each health care resource unit by the amount reimbursed by a payer. Health care resource utilization units are a way to normalize the quantity of health care provided to each participant so that costs can be compared.
Time frame: 24 months