Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

National Taiwan University Hospital100 enrolled

Overview

This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

100

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Interventions

Automatic CPR machineDEVICE

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 16 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric * Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team Exclusion Criteria: * Younger than 15 years old * Traumatic cardia arrest * Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Quality of CPR

Secondary Outcomes

End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER

Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate

Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.