Three main clinical outcomes will be assessed: 1. Post-test resource utilization as assessed by referral rate to catheterization within 90-days of the index study; 2. Incremental prognostic value and risk stratification for predicting cardiac death and myocardial infarction; 3. Cost-effectiveness To this end, SPARC is organized with two distinct specific objectives with important differences in patient population and endpoints. Specific Aim 1: To evaluate the impact of stress perfusion imaging with SPECT or PET, CT Angiography, and hybrid PET-CT on post-test resource utilization. The primary endpoint of specific aim 1 is to compare the impact of combined myocardial perfusion-coronary anatomy data to that of perfusion only \[stress SPECT, stress cardiac PET (without CTA)\] and anatomy only (CTA alone) on post-test resource utilization, as measured by referral to cardiac catheterization within 90 days of index noninvasive testing, in patients without CAD. Secondary endpoints: 1. to compare the diagnostic accuracy for detection of epicardial CAD of stress PET and hybrid PET-CT, stress SPECT, and CTA, as defined by coronary angiography; 2. to compare the referral rate to revascularization within 90 days of cardiac catheterization. Specific Aim 2: To compare the incremental prognostic value and risk stratification of stress perfusion imaging with SPECT or PET, CT coronary angiography, and combined perfusion-anatomy imaging approaches. The primary endpoint of specific aim 2 is to compare the incremental value of stress perfusion only (stress PET and stress SPECT), coronary anatomy only (CTA data), and combined perfusion-anatomy studies (PET+CTA and SPECT+CTA) over clinical, historical and stress test data for the prediction of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoints: 1. to compare the incremental value of these noninvasive imaging approaches over clinical, historical and stress test data for the prediction of a composite endpoint including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, late (\>6 month from index study) referral to revascularization, or late (\>6 month from index study) hospitalization for chest pain or heart failure; 2. to compare the incremental value of these noninvasive imaging approaches over clinical, historical and stress test data for the prediction of all cause mortality. In addition, the ability of these modalities -together and separately- to risk stratify patients is a primary goal of specific aim 2.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
3,019
Cardiovascular Associates
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
The Heart Center
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Scottsdale Medical Imaging
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Scripps Center for Integrative Medicine
La Jolla, California, United States
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Inst.
Torrance, California, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Yale - New Haven VA Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
...and 31 more locations