Eligible patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer will be treated with dual agent monoclonal antibody consisting of cetuximab and bevacizumab alone or in combination with gemcitabine
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
61
I.V. infusion of 400 mg/m2 (over 120 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 1
10 mg/kg (over 60 minutes) on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks.
1000 mg/m2 administered intravenously at 10 mg/m2/minute over 100 minutes weekly x 3 of 4 weeks.
ImClone Investigational Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, United States
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival is the time from randomization until the date of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause whichever is first reported. Patients who die without a reported prior progression were considered to have progresssed on the day of their death. Patients who did not progress were censored at the day of their last tumor assessment.
Time frame: Time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause (Range: 0 -10 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
This measure is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Survival of living patients or those who lost to follow-up were censored on the last date the patients were known to be alive.
Time frame: Survival information was collected continuously every 3 months after completion of therapy and/or follow-up (range: 1-19 months).
The Number of Patients With a Best Overall Response of Either a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
The best overall response is the number of patients with a best overall response of CR or PR, as classifed by the investigator according to the RECIST guidelines. A CR is the disappearance of all target lesions and a PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.
Time frame: Tumor evaluations were performed every 8 weeks while on cetuximab therapy until PD or recurrence. Patients with a PR or CR had a confirmatory tumor assessment no less than 4 weeks after the initial evaluation.
Percentage of Patients With Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) Response at End of Cycle 2 in Patients With Elevated Baseline Values (Equal or Greater Than 2 x Upper Limit of Normal).
CA19-9 is a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer and the level usually increases as the disease is progressing. The CA19-9 response was the percentage of patients whose CA19-9 level was declining, stable or increasing \< 10% compared with baseline, divided by the total patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 in that arm.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
I.V.infusions of 250 mg/m2 (over 60 minutes) weekly
ImClone Investigational Site
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, United States
ImClone Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
...and 6 more locations
Time frame: First day of treatment to the end of Cycle 2, Week 1
Time to Progression (TTP)
Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization until the date of objectively confirmed tumor progression was first reported. The censoring rule was consistent with PFS except death. Patients who died from any cause were censored at the time of death or at last tumor assessment date if the death date was missing. For patients lost to follow-up, they were censored at the last tumor assessment date.
Time frame: Time from randomization until the date of objective tumor progression was first reported (range: 11 -38 months)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Reported AEs per patient were coded according to the corresponding preferred term and system organ class in the Medical Dictionary for regulatory Activities dictionary. The National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0 was used to grade all AEs. The collection of AEs began at the time the patient received the first cetuximab dose and continued during the study until 30 days after the last dose of cetuximab. All patients who were enrolled and treated with cetuximab were assessed for safety (mITT population, as treated).
Time frame: An AE was included in the safety analysis if its onset date occurred anytime during cetuximab treatment or up to 30 days after the last dose of cetuximab.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment Using the Linear Analog Scale Assessment (LASA), Overall QoL at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Overall QoL question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Overall Mental Well Being, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Overall Mental Well Being question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Overall Physical Well Being, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Overall Physical Well Being question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Overall Emotional Well Being, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Overall Emotional Well Being question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Level of Social Activity, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Level of Social Activity question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Overall Spiritual Well Being, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Overall Spiritual Well Being question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up while receiving study drug
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Frequency of Pain, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Frequency of Pain question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Severity of Pain, Average, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Severity of Pain question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A positive score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up while receiving study drug
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Level of Fatigue, Average, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Level of Fatigue question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A positive score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Level of Support, Friends and Family, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Level of Support, Friends and Family question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Financial Concerns, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Financial Concerns Question question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in QoL Assessment Using LASA, Legal Concerns, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. The primary analysis of pancreatic cancer symptoms was conducted using the LASA QoL questionnaire and was considered exploratory. The Legal Concerns question change from baseline to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The best overall score is 10 and the worst is 0. A negative score indicates worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Pain Using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form, Worst Pain, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. Analysis of pain using the BPI was considered exploratory. The Worst Pain (change from baseline) to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The worst pain is 10 and no pain is 0. A negative score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Pain Using BPI Short Form, Least Pain, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. Analysis of pain using the BPI was considered exploratory. The Least Pain (change from baseline) to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The worst pain is 10 and no pain is 0. A negative score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Pain Using BPI Short Form, Average Pain, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. Analysis of pain using the BPI was considered exploratory. The Average Pain (change from baseline) to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The worst pain was 10 and no pain is 0. A negative score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Pain Using BPI Short Form, Pain Right Now, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. Analysis of pain using the BPI was considered exploratory. The Pain Right Now question (change from baseline) to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. The worst pain is 10 and no pain is 0. A negative score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Pain Using BPI Short Form, Interference, at Cycle 2 Week 4
Accrual on the trial was stopped earlier than planned due to insufficient efficacy on both arms. Analysis of pain using the BPI was considered exploratory. The Interference question (change from baseline) to Cycle 2 Week 4 is reported. Complete interference is scored as 10 and no interference is scored as 0. A negative score indicates improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Screening, and then every 8 weeks while receiving study drug to 30-day follow-up