This is an initial placebo-controlled study followed by open treatment evaluating the effectiveness and tolerability of ropinirole long-term in patients with moderate to severe Restless Legs Syndrome.
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ropinirole for 26 weeks and to further evaluate the incidence of augmentation and rebound for a further 40 weeks open-label extension treatment period in subjects suffering from moderate to severe Restless Legs Syndrome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
404
Matching Placebo
Ropinirole IR 0.25mg/day to 4mg/day for RLS
Mean Change From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating Scale Total Score at Week 12 and Week 26
A 10-item, participant-reported scale covering different symptoms of the condition. Each item is scored from 0 to 4; 0 represents the absence of a problem and 4 reflects a very severe problem. The best and worst possible scores are 0 and 40, respectively; higher scores represent a greater severity of symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, and a negative treatment difference indicates a benefit of Ropinirole IR over placebo. The primary assessment was made by calculating the difference in the average score obtained at Baseline with scores at Week 12 and then Week 26.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Augmentation and Early Morning Rebound (EMR) Cases
Clinically meaningful augmentation and early morning rebound (EMR) were assessed and confirmed by an independent Adjudication Board. EMR describes the development of RLS symptoms during the early morning, following therapeutic intervention. EMR is differentiated from augmentation, in which the earlier onset of symptoms occurs in the evening.
Time frame: During 15-month study duration at scheduled (Weeks 16, 20, 26, or early withdrawal for DB phase; Weeks 39, 47, 55, 63, 67, or early withdrawal for the OL phase) and unscheduled (26-week DB phase and 40-week OL phase) visits
Mean Change From Baseline in the International RLS (IRLS) Rating Scale Total Score at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 16, and 20
A 10-item, participant-reported scale covering different RLS symptoms. Each item is scored from 0 to 4; 0 represents the absence of a problem and 4 reflects a very severe problem. The best and worst possible scores are 0 and 40, respectively; higher scores represent a greater severity of symptoms. The primary assessment from this study was made by calculating the difference in the average score obtained at Baseline with scores at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 16, and 20. Scores were adjusted for baseline IRLS total score, treatment group, visit, visit by treatment group interaction, and center group.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Kippa-Ring, Queensland, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Woodville, South Australia, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Olomouc, Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Ostrava, Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Pardubice, Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, Czechia
GSK Investigational Site
Aalborg, Denmark
...and 29 more locations
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, 16, and 20
Change From Baseline in the Domains of the 12-item Medical Outcomes Study (MOS-12) Sleep Scale at Weeks 12 and 26
The MOS-12 Sleep Scale is a comprehensive battery, which measures specific aspects of sleep in participants that may have varying co-morbidities, and, as a result, is appropriate for a medically diverse participant population. Domain values are presented on a 0-100 scale, where a higher score means a greater degree of the attribute implied by the scale name. Scores were adjusted for baseline MOS sleep scale domain value, treatment group, visit, visit by treatment interaction, and center group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26
Change From Baseline in Sleep Quantity, a Domain of the 12-item Medical Outcomes Study (MOS-12) Sleep Scale, at Weeks 12 and 26
The MOS-12 Sleep Scale is a comprehensive battery, which measures specific aspects of sleep in participants that may have varying co-morbidities, and, as a result, is appropriate for a medically diverse participant population.Scores were adjusted for baseline MOS sleep scale domain value, treatment group, visit, visit by treatment interaction, and center group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26
Change From Baseline in the Johns Hopkins RLS Quality of Life (RLS QoL) Questionnaire Overall Life Impact Score at Weeks 12 and 26
The Johns Hopkins RLS QoL Questionnaire is a disease-specific instrument that assesses the impact of RLS on the daily life, emotional well-being, social life, and work life of participants. The overall life impact score for the John Hopkins RLS QoL scale ranges from a lowest possible score of 0 to a highest possible score of 100. Higher scores represent better quality of life. Scores were adjusted for baseline RLS Quality of Life score, treatment group, visit, visit by treatment interaction, and center group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26
Change From Baseline in the Domains of the MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Weeks 12 and 26
The MOS SF-36 is a generic QoL instrument measuring functional status and well-being. Positive change from baseline for all domains indicates improvement. For all MOS SF-36 domains, the minimum and maximum scores are 0 and 100, respectively, for the transformed scale. Scores were adjusted for baseline domain score, treatment group, visit, visit by treatment interaction, and center group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 26
Percentage of Participants With a Score of Much/Very Much Improved on the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Weeks 1, 12 and 26
The CGI-I is a psychometric instrument that is used to measure general clinical status in a variety of disease states. The CGI-I allows the investigator to rate the participant's global improvement or worsening compared with the condition at Baseline (Day 0). The scale is rated from 1-7 (1 = very much improved; 7 = very much worse). Typically, a participant with a score of 1 or 2 (much improved) is considered a responder.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 12 and 26
Number of Participants Withdrawing Due to Lack of Efficacy During the First 26 Weeks of the Study
Lack of efficacy is defined as up to a 10% improvement in the IRLS Rating Scale total score from the participant's Baseline value and at least 12 weeks of treatment during the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 26
Number of Participants Rated as Normal or Borderline Ill on the CGI Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale at Week 26
The CGI-S scale is a psychometric instrument that is used to measure general clinical status in a variety of disease states. The CGI-S allows the investigator to rate the severity of the participant's illness considering their total clinical experience with the subject population being studied and on all information available at the time of rating. The scale is rated from 1-7 (1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severly ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants).
Time frame: Week 26
Median Time to First CGI-I Response of Much/Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Phase
The median time to first CGI-I response of much/very much improved was calculated. The CGI-I is a psychometric instrument that is used to measure general clinical status in a variety of disease states. The CGI-I allows the investigator to rate the participant's global improvement or worsening compared with the condition at Baseline (Day 0). The scale is rated from 1-7 (1 = very much improved; 7 = very much worse). Typically, a participant with a score of 1 or 2 (much improved) is considered a responder.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 26
Number of Participants With a Score of Much/Very Much Improved on the CGI-I Scale at Week 67
The CGI-I is a psychometric instrument that is used to measure general clinical status in a variety of disease states. The CGI-I allows the investigator to rate the participant's global improvement or worsening compared with the condition at Baseline (Day 0). The scale is rated from 1-7 (1 = very much improved; 7 = very much worse). Typically, a participant with a score of 1 or 2 (much improved) is considered a responder.
Time frame: Week 67
Mean Change From Baseline in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score at Week 67
A 10-item, participant-reported scale covering different symptoms of the condition. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 0 representing the absence of a problem and 4 reflecting a very severe problem. The best and worst possible scores are 0 and 40, respectively. The primary assessment was made by calculating the difference in the average score obtained at Baseline with score at Week 67.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 67