In the course of their disease, most patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) face mounting mobility deficits, including difficulties with walking, balance, posture and transfers. This frequently leads to (fear of) falls, injuries, loss of independence, and inactivity which causes social isolation and increases the risk of osteoporosis or cardiovascular disease. These mobility deficits are difficult to treat with drugs and neurosurgery. However, physiotherapy is deemed effective in improving mobility deficits in PD. Physiotherapy is widely prescribed for this purpose in the Netherlands. Yet, the efficiency of current "usual care" physiotherapy can be questioned, for two reasons. First, the referral process seems inadequate because patients are mainly referred by neurologists who often lack insight into the (im-)possibilities of physiotherapy for PD. Consequently, patients with a real need for physiotherapy are not always referred (undertreatment), whereas others without a real need are (overtreatment). Furthermore, most therapists treating PD patients are not specifically trained in treating these patients. This is not surprising because average therapists rarely treat more than two patients per year in their practice. Therefore, patients who are being referred probably receive suboptimal treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the efficiency of physiotherapeutic care for patients with Parkinson's disease can be improved, at a reduced cost, by targeting two key elements of the current care system: a) inadequate referral by neurologists; b) suboptimal treatment by physiotherapists. We expect that optimal referral combined with expert treatment will increase the efficiency, as reflected by increased health benefits for patients at equal or reduced costs'.
Design In a Cluster Randomised Trial, 16 clusters will be randomly allocated to either network care (8 clusters with an altered organisation of physiotherapeutic care) or usual care (8 clusters with unchanged organisation of physiotherapeutic care). Clusters are formed by all PD patients living in the communities connected to participating regional hospitals in the 16 clusters. The health care intervention in the experimental group has two elements: (a) an improved quality of referrals by neurologists; and (b) an improved quality of interventions by physiotherapists. Brief description Network Care: In each of the Network Care clusters, 5 to 7 motivated therapists are selected to enroll in a regional ParkNet and consequently trained. Training is focused at correct use of the evidence-based guidelines for physiotherapy in PD (Keus et al, 2006). This training consists of a 5-day competence-oriented course, web-based continues education supported by seminars, and use of a PD specific electronic patient record. Neurologists are informed about indications for referral to physiotherapy. Improved communication between neurologist and ParkNet therapists is initiated and supported. Following implementation of the health care change, PD patients attending the neurological outpatient clinics of the individual hospitals within the clusters will be asked to participate. During a period of 6 months, PD patients will enrol in the study. Enrollees will be followed for 6 months to measure the use and quality of physiotherapy, patient health benefit and satisfaction, and costs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
708
Development of a network of dedicated physiotherapist with specific expertise in Parkinson's Disease and structured referrals to these ParkNet therapists by neurologists.
No altered organisation of physiotherapy care in Parkinson's Disease
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Alkmaar, Netherlands
Gelre Ziekenhuis
Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Gooi Noord
Blaricum, Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf Groep
Delft, Netherlands
Slingeland Ziekenhuis
Doetinchem, Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei
Ede, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Maxima Medisch Centrum
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
Gouda, Netherlands
...and 8 more locations
Modified MACTAR scale
Time frame: 6 months
Parkinson Activity Scale (secondary)
Time frame: 6 months
Costs
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of correct referrals (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of physiotherapy(tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of Falls (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
ALDS (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
SF-36 (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
EQ-5D (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Satisfaction of patients and professionals (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Self Assessment Disability Scale (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire {tertiary}
Time frame: 6 months
6 meter walk test {tertiary}
Time frame: 6 months
4x3 meter walk test (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Single leg stance (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Posture and Gait score (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Timed Up and Go (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Falls Efficacy Scale {tertiary}
Time frame: 6 months
9-hole pegboard test {tertiary}
Time frame: 6 months
Health Anxiety and Depression Scale (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Physical activities assessed with the LAPAQ questionnaire (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
Caregiver burden assessed with the Care Giver Strain Index (tertiary)
Time frame: 6 months
PDQ-39 (Mobility Scale)
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.