To demonstrate clinically significant improvements or lack thereof in the caudal epidural patients with our without steroids. To evaluate differences in outcomes in patients receiving steroids compared to those patients randomized to the local anesthetic group who did not receive steroids. To assess improvements among patients and compare steroid groups with each other and local anesthetic group. To evaluate and compare the adverse event profile in all patients
Patients with chronic low back pain of at least 6 months duration, non-responsive to conservative management with NSAIDS, physical therapy or chiropractic treatment exercises. A single-center, prospective, controlled, double blinded, randomized study of patients in 4 groups. * Group 1. local anesthetics only * Group 2. local anesthetic with 6mg of non-particulate Celestone * Group 3. local anesthetic with 6 mg of brand name Celestone * Group 4. local anesthetic with 40 mg of alcohol-free DepoMedrol All patients will be unblinded in 12 months. Non-responsive patients will be unblinded after 3 months and will be crossed over to a different group
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
240
group 1: Caudal epidural injection local anesthetics only
Group 2. Caudal Epidural Injection local anesthetic with 6mg of non-particulate Celestone
Group 3. Caudal Epidural Injection with local anesthetic with 6 mg of brand name Celestone
Ambulatory Surgery Center
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
To evaluate for differences between the patients in various groups in the physical function and pain at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post treatment
Time frame: 1,3,6,12 months
To assess adverse events in all four groups.
Time frame: 1,3,6,12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Group 4. local anesthetic with 40 mg of alcohol-free DepoMedrol