To evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin in patients with proven invasive aspergillosis and who are refractory or intolerant to previous systemic antifungal therapy. To compare the efficacy and safety of the micafungin therapy with the active control arm
This is a phase II, multicentre, prospective, active-controlled, open-label, 2:1 randomised and parallel group clinical study. Patients will be stratified according to the baseline infection status and the baseline neutropenic status: * Intolerant to previous antifungal therapy * Refractory to previous antifungal therapy; progression of infection * Refractory to previous antifungal therapy; failure to improve In case, criteria for both intolerant and refractory are fulfilled at the same time the patient will be considered as refractory. * Neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count (ANC \< 500 cells/mm3) * Non neutropenic (ANC \>= 500 cells/mm3)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
17
IV
Independent Data Review Board (IDRB) assessment of the overall success at the End of Treatment (EoT) defined as complete or partial clinical response.
Time frame: Weeks 3-12
Overall success at end of treatment
Time frame: Weeks 3-12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unnamed facility
La Plata, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Aalst, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unnamed facility
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Unnamed facility
Campinas, Brazil
Unnamed facility
Curitiba, Brazil
Unnamed facility
Goiânia, Brazil
...and 36 more locations