This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study will be performed in approximately 600 subjects with chronic idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. An open-label safety extension will follow.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
588
EUFLEXXA™ is supplied in a single-dose syringe containing 20 mg/2 ml of 1% sodium hyaluronate (molecular weight 2.4-3.6 MD); sodium chloride, 17 mg; disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate, 1.12 mg; sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, 0.1 mg; enough water for injection to make 2.0 ml. EUFLEXXA™ is supplied in 2.25 ml nominal volume, disposable prefilled glass syringes containing 2 mL of EUFLEXXA™. Only the contents of the syringe are sterile. EUFLEXXA™ is nonpyrogenic. See package insert for further details.
Placebo is supplied in a disposable prefilled glass syringe. Each single-dose syringe will contain 2 mL of phosphate buffered saline. Only the contents of the syringe are sterile.
Investigational site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Observed Pain Scores on 50-foot Walk Test During the Double-blind Study
The level of pain is estimated by the participant following a walk of 50 feet in length which is observed by the investigator. Pain estimates were evaluated on a 100 millimeter visual analog scale. A score of 0 millimeters means there was no pain observed; a score of 100 millimeters means extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Observed Pain Scores on 50-foot Walk Test During the Double-blind Study
The percent difference in participant pain recorded by the participant during a walk of 50 feet in length between the baseline (week 0) and week 26 scores. Scores are measured on a visual analog scale of 100 millimeters; a score of 0 millimeters meaning no pain was observed; a score of 100 millimeters meaning extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: Weeks 0 and 26
Shifts From Extension Study Baseline (Week 26) in Range of Motion Findings at Week 52
Number of participants in various categories of target knee joint examination findings from baseline (week 26 pre-injection) to week 52. Range of motion indicates the flexibility of the knee, and is measured by the number of degrees between when the knee is hyper-extended and when the knee is flexed.
Time frame: weeks 26 and 52
Shifts From Extension Study Baseline (Week 26) in Ratings of Knee Tenderness at Week 52
Number of participants in various categories of target knee joint examination findings from baseline (week 26 pre-injection) to week 52. Tenderness of the knee was subjectively rated by participants as none, mild, moderate or severe.
Time frame: weeks 26 and 52
Shifts From Extension Study Baseline (Week 26) in Ratings of Knee Local Warmth at Week 52
Number of participants in various categories of target knee joint examination findings from baseline (week 26 pre-injection) to week 52. Local warmth of the target knee was recorded as Yes (warmth present) or No (knee was not warmer than expected).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: weeks 26 and 52
Shifts From Extension Study Baseline (Week 26) in Ratings of Knee Redness at Week 52
Number of participants in various categories of target knee joint examination findings from baseline (week 26 pre-injection) to week 52. Redness of the knee was subjectively rated as Yes (knee was red) and No (knee was not red).
Time frame: weeks 26 and 52
Percent Change From Screening in Observed Pain Scores on 50-foot Walk Test During the Double-blind Study
The percent difference in participant pain recorded by the participant during a walk of 50 feet in length between the screening (week -1) and week 26 scores. Scores are measured on a visual analog scale of 100 millimeters; a score of 0 millimeters means there was no pain observed; a score of 100 millimeters means extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: weeks -1 and 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Observed Pain Scores on 50-foot Walk Test During the Double-blind Study for a Subpopulation of Participants With More Severe Knee Pain
Percent difference in participant pain during a walk of 50 feet in length between the mean screening (week -1) and baseline(week 0) scores, and week 26 scores. Scores are recorded by participants and measured on a visual analog scale of 100 millimeters, with 0 millimeters meaning there was no pain observed; 100 millimeters meaning extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: weeks -1, 0, and 26
Number of Observed Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI30) Responders Using the 50-Foot Walk Test at Week 12
Responders are identified based on a calculation of three scales: 50-foot walk test for pain, function and global assessment scales. Each of the individual scales was completed by the participant. A participant was a responder (answer: YES) if there was high improvement in pain or function (\>=50 percent and absolute change of \>=20 millimeters), or improvement in at least two of three categories: Pain and/or Function and/or Patient Global Assessment scales of \>=20 percent and absolute change \>=10 millimeter.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Observed Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI30) Responders Using the 50-Foot Walk Test at Week 26
Responders are identified based on a calculation of three scales: 50-foot walk test for pain, function and global assessment scales. Each of the individual scales was completed by the participant. A participant was a responder (answer: YES) if there was high improvement in pain or function (\>=50 percent and absolute change of \>=20 millimeters), or improvement in at least two of three categories: Pain and/or Function and/or Patient Global Assessment scales of \>=20 percent and absolute change \>=10 millimeter.
Time frame: Week 26
Number of Observed Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI30) Responders Using the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC A) Pain Scale at Week 12
Responders are identified based on a calculation of three scales: WOMAC (A) pain, function and global assessment scales. Each of the individual scales was completed by the participant. A participant was a responder (answer: YES) if there was high improvement in pain or function (\>=50 percent and absolute change of \>=20 millimeters), or improvement in at least two of three categories: Pain and/or Function and/or Patient Global Assessment scales of \>=20 percent and absolute change \>=10 millimeter.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Observed Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI30) Responders Using the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC A) Pain Scale at Week 26
Responders are identified based on a calculation of three scales: WOMAC (A) pain, function and global assessment scales. Each of the individual scales was completed by the participant. A participant was a responder (answer: YES) if there was high improvement in pain or function (\>=50 percent and absolute change of \>=20 millimeters), or improvement in at least two of three categories: Pain and/or Function and/or Patient Global Assessment scales of \>=20 percent and absolute change \>=10 millimeter.
Time frame: week 26
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Knee Pain at Week 26
Participant assessment of knee pain evaluated on a 100 millimeter visual analog scale. A score of 0 millimeters means there was no pain; a score of 100 millimeters means extreme pain.
Time frame: Weeks 0 and 26
Change From Baseline in the Number of Tablets of Rescue Medication Used at Week 26.
The change in the number of tablets of 500 milligram acetaminophen used in a week as rescue medication is compared at weeks 0 and weeks 26.
Time frame: Weeks 0 and 26
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 26
The SF-36 questionnaire yields a score for each domain of health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. This table summarizes the change from baseline in participants' physical function. The questionnaire is completed by participants.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 26
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) Bodily Pain(BP) Score at Week 26
The SF-36 questionnaire yields a score for each domain of health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. This table summarizes the change from baseline in participants' bodily pain scores. The questionnaire is completed by participants.
Time frame: weeks 0 and 26
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) General Health(GH) Score at Week 26
The SF-36 questionnaire yields a score for each domain of health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. This table summarizes the change from baseline in participants' general health scores. The questionnaire is completed by participants.
Time frame: weeks 0 and 26
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 26
The SF-36 questionnaire yields a score for each domain of health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. The questionnaire is completed by participants. This table summarizes the change from baseline in participants' physical health.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 26
Number of Participants With 20 Millimeter or Greater Improvement in Pain Scores on the 50-foot Walk Test
Yes represents the number of participants whose pain during a walk of 50 feet in length was improved at week 26 over baseline by at least 20 millimeters. Pain was evaluated on a 100 millimeter visual analog scale by participants. A score of 0 millimeters means there was no pain observed; a score of 100 millimeters means extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: Weeks 0 and 26
Observed Pain Scores on the 50-foot Walk Test During the Extension Study
Participant pain during a walk of 50 feet in length was evaluated by participants on a 100 millimeter visual analog scale. A score of 0 millimeters means there was no pain observed; a score of 100 millimeters means extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: Baseline (week 26), week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Observed Pain Scores on 50-foot Walk Test During the Extension Study
The mean difference in participant pain as measured by participants during a walk of 50 feet in length between the baseline (week 26 pre-dose) and week 52 scores. Scores are measured on a visual analog scale of 100 millimeters, with a score of 0 millimeters meaning there was no pain observed; a score of 100 millimeters meaning extreme pain was observed.
Time frame: Extension baseline (week 26), week 52
Number of Observed Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI30) Responders Using the 50-Foot Walk Test at Week 52
Responders are identified based on a calculation of three scales: 50-foot walk test for pain, function and global assessment scales. Each of the individual scales was completed by the participant. A participant was a responder (answer:YES) if there was high improvement in pain or function (\>=50 percent and absolute change of \>=20 millimeters), or improvement in at least two of three categories: Pain and/or Function and/or Patient Global Assessment scales of \>=20 percent and absolute change \>=10 millimeter.
Time frame: Week 52 (Extension Study)
Change From Baseline (Extension Study Week 26) in Use of Rescue Medication at Week 52.
The change in the number of tablets of study-specific acetaminophen taken per week as a rescue medication from knee pain.
Time frame: Extension baseline (week 26 pre-dose), week 52