This registry was observational (only collected information typically noted by the surgeon when their patients were routinely seen); there was no change to the care the patient received as a result of being part of the registry). Data collection focused on the surgical outcomes of AMS prolapse products.
The Prolapse Registry was an observational study of patients who were implanted with AMS devices for the surgical repair of female pelvic prolapse. The registry followed patients post-operatively for up to 2 years and collected demographic, clinical, surgical, safety, and patient outcomes data. The registry was a web-based system in which surgeons entered patient information with regard to their prolapse surgery. All information entered was de-identified (no names, no date of birth, no date of surgery, etc).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,543
AMS Apogee™ with IntePro (Synthetic) or InteXen (Biologic) Mesh implant for posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse AMS Straight-In™ with IntePro (Synthetic) Mesh implant for vaginal vault pelvic organ prolapse AMS Perigee™ with IntePro Mesh implant for anterior wall pelvic organ prolapse AMS Perigee™ with IntePro Mesh coated with PC AMS Elevate® Prolapse Repair System Family
Samuel Zylstra, MD
Whitinsville, Massachusetts, United States
Count of Patients With at Least One Adverse Event Related to Any AMS Prolapse Device
Time frame: up to 2-years post-implant
Prolapse Efficacy Success Rate
Success was defined as either (1) Baden-Walker grade 0 or 1 or (2) (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) POP-Q stage 0 or 1. If a site reported both measurements, then the POP-Q score was used.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.