Primary purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two different nevirapine (Viramune) dosing regimens (once daily (QD) and twice daily (BID) application) and of atazanavir/ritonavir (Reyataz/Norvir), all on an emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) (Truvada) background. Patients will receive either nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg twice daily, or NVP 400 mg once daily , or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATZ/r), all in combination with emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir DF (TDF). All patients receiving NVP will start at 200 mg once daily for 2 weeks, because it has been demonstrated that this lead-in dosing regimen reduces the frequency of NVP-induced rash. At Visit 3 (Week 2), patients increase the NVP dose to either 200 mg twice daily or to 400 mg once daily. Patients receiving ATZ/r will be treated with ATZ 300 mg once daily, boosted by 100 mg ritonavir (RTV) once daily. Background antiretroviral therapy for all patients consists of one tablet of Truvada. Treatment duration is 48 weeks (primary endpoint) with an extension to 144 weeks. Patients may also participate in the metabolic sub-study, comparing NVP and ATZ/r for signs and symptoms of lipodystrophy and serum lipid/glycaemic abnormalities.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
576
nevirapine twice daily
nevirapine once daily
atazanavir once daily
1100.1470.54004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Capital Federal, Argentina
1100.1470.54002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Córdoba, Argentina
1100.1470.54003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mar del Plata, Argentina
1100.1470.54001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rosario, Argentina
1100.1470.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin, Germany
Treatment Response at Week 48
Treatment response is defined as a viral load (VL) \<50 copies/mL measured at two consecutive visits prior to Week 48 and without subsequent rebound or change of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy prior to Week 48.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Treatment Response at Week 48 (TLOVR Algorithm)
Treatment response is defined as a VL \<50 copies/mL measured at two consecutive visits up to Week 48 and without subsequent rebound or change of ARV therapy up to Week 48, based on time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) algorithm, as a sensitivity analysis for the primary analysis.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Proportion of Patients With VL < 50 Copies/ml
VL \<50 copies/mL among observed patients on treatment at each visit, with the final visit at Week 144 or end of trial (EOT) for the patient
Time frame: From baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144/EOT
Proportion of Patients With VL < 400 Copies/ml
VL \<400 copies/mL among observed patients on treatment at each visit, with the final visit at Week 144 or end of trial (EOT)
Time frame: From baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144/EOT
Change in CD4+ Count From Baseline
Change in CD4+ cell count from baseline among patients on treatment at each visit, with the final visit at Week 144 or EOT
Time frame: From baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132 and 144/EOT
Change in Framingham Score From Baseline
Change in the estimated risk of cardiovascular disease using the Framingham algorithm from baseline to after 48, 96 and 144 weeks, last observation carried forward (LOCF). The score is based on age, gender, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and smoking status. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating a greater risk.
Time frame: From baseline to Weeks 48, 96 and 144/EOT
Change in Mental Health Summary (MHS) Score From Baseline
Quality of life (QoL) assessment by change in MHS score from baseline to after 48, 96 and 144 weeks (observed cases), from the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV), a 35-item self-administered questionnaire including 10 scales covering: health perceptions, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, social and cognitive functioning, mental health, energy/fatigue, health distress, and QoL. The MHS is a weighted average of the 10 scales and ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Time frame: From baseline to Weeks 48, 96 and 144/EOT
Change in Physical Health Summary (PHS) Score From Baseline
QoL assessment by change in PHS score from baseline to after 48, 96 and 144 weeks (observed cases), from the MOS-HIV, a 35-item self-administered questionnaire including 10 scales covering: health perceptions, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, social and cognitive functioning, mental health, energy/fatigue, health distress, and QoL. The PHS is a weighted average of the 10 scales and ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Time frame: From baseline to Weeks 48, 96 and 144/EOT
Number of Patients Hospitalized
Cost effectiveness assessment by number of patients hospitalized
Time frame: From baseline to Week 24, Week 24 to 48, Week 48 to 96, and Week 96 to 144/EOT
Non-scheduled Physician Visits
Cost effectiveness assessment by number of patients with non-scheduled physician visits
Time frame: From baseline to Week 24, Week 24 to 48, Week 48 to 96, and Week 96 to 144/EOT
Genotypic Resistance Associated With Virologic Failure
Number of treatment-emergent drug-associated substitutions in patients with virological failure up to Week 48. The total number of genotypic mutations in those patients who were virologic failures is given, not the number of patients with mutations.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Treatment-emergent AIDS-defining Illness
Treatment-emergent AIDS-defining illness (tr.-emerg. AIDS-def.illness) including worsening during treatment
Time frame: From baseline to Week 144
Treatment-emergent AIDS-defining Illness Leading to Death
Patients with an AIDS-defining illness leading to death broken out by treatment. Statistical analysis shows time to death from AIDS-defining illness.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 144
Lipodystrophy
Number of patients with AE lipodystrophy
Time frame: From baseline to Week 144
Serum Lipid Abnormalities
Number of patients with AE elevated serum lipids (i.e. hypercholesterolaemia)
Time frame: From baseline to Week 144
Glycaemic Abnormalities
Number of patients with AE elevated serum glucose
Time frame: From baseline to Week 144
Treatment Response at Week 96
Treatment response is defined as a viral load (VL) \<50 copies/mL measured at two consecutive visits prior to Week 96 and without subsequent rebound or change of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy prior to Week 96.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 96
Treatment Response at Week 144
Treatment response is defined as a viral load (VL) \<50 copies/mL measured at two consecutive visits prior to Week 144 and without subsequent rebound or change of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy prior to Week 144.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 144
Proportion of Patients With Virological Rebound With VL >=50 Copies/mL After CVR (Confirmed Virological Response) at Week 24, 48, 96, 144
The analyses of virologic rebound were performed on the original values at each visit(ORGV) rather than calculated results within time windows (CAL)
Time frame: at Week 24, 48, 96, 144
Proportion of Patients With Virological Rebound With VL >=400 Copies/mL After CVR at Week 24, 48, 96, 144
The analyses of virologic rebound were performed on the original values at each visit(ORGV) rather than calculated results within time windows (CAL)
Time frame: at Week 24, 48, 96, 144
Proportion of Patients With Virologic Failure at Week 48, 96, 144
Time frame: at Week 48, 96, 144
Time to Treatment Response (First Confirmed VL<50 Copies/mL)
Time to treatment response was defined as the time from start of treatment until the first measurement of the first confirmed virological response
Time frame: baseline to week 144
Time to Loss of Virologic Response (Rebound)
Time to loss of virologic response (TLOVR) was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first measurement showing VL ≥ 50 copies/mL in the first virologic rebound, after having a confirmed virological response.
Time frame: Baseline to week 144
Time to Treatment Failure
Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of the first of at least one of the following events: early discontinuation of trial drug, change in ARV therapy, failure to achieve an HIV RNA count \< 50 copies/mL up to Visit 10 (week 48) or loss of virologic response
Time frame: baseline to week 144
Change in the Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Week 48, 96 and 144
Calculations based on the MDRD algorithm.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48, 96, 144
Proportion of Patients With >= DAIDS Grade 2 Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: week 148
Proportion of Patients Reporting Rash of Any Severity
Proportion of Patients reporting rash of any severity
Time frame: week 148
Proportion of Patients Reporting Hepatic Events of Any Severity
Proportion of Patients reporting hepatic events of any severity
Time frame: week 148
Proportion of Patients Reporting CNS (Central Nervous System) Side Effects of Any Severity
Proportion of Patients reporting CNS (central nervous system) side effects of any severity
Time frame: week 148
Change of Cholesterol Values From Baseline to Week 48, 96, 144
Changes frombaseline in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol(LDL-c) and HDL
Time frame: baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Changes of Apolipoprotein Values From Baseline to Week 48, 96, 144
Changes frombaseline apolipoprotein A1 \& B
Time frame: baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Change of hsCRP From Baseline to Week 48, 96, 144
Change of hsCRP from baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Time frame: baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Change of Total Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 48, 96, 144
Change of total triglycerides from baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Time frame: baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Change of Total Cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol Ratio From Baseline to Week 48, 96, 144
Change of Total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol ratio from baseline to week 48, 96, 144
Time frame: baseline to week 48, 96, 144
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
1100.1470.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin, Germany
1100.1470.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bochum, Germany
1100.1470.49018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bonn, Germany
1100.1470.49014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Düsseldorf, Germany
1100.1470.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Erlangen, Germany
...and 58 more locations