The purpose of this investigation is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the LDR Spine Mobi-C® Cervical Disc Prosthesis which is an anterior cervical interbody mechanical device. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the overall success rate of the investigational device as compared to the control in the treatment of patients with symptomatic DDD with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy at one or two adjacent levels. Patients should be without prior cervical fusion between C3 and C7 and unresponsive to non-operative conservative treatment for six weeks after symptom onset or have the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve/spinal cord compression despite continued non-operative conservative treatment.
Objectives of the Investigation The purpose of this investigation is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the LDR Spine Mobi-C® Cervical Disc Prosthesis which is an anterior cervical interbody mechanical device. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the overall success rate of the investigational device as compared to the control in the treatment of patients with symptomatic DDD with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy at one or two adjacent levels. Patients should be without prior cervical fusion between C3 and C7 and unresponsive to non-operative conservative treatment for six weeks after symptom onset or have the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve/spinal cord compression despite continued non-operative conservative treatment. Study Design Rationale The study is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, concurrently controlled investigation, in which the study device will be compared to the control treatment consisting of conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in accordance with the Smith-Robinson procedure. Patients will be followed for two years postsurgery (primary endpoint) and at 3, 4, 5, and 7 years thereafter. Duration of the Investigation Patients will be followed post-operatively at 6 weeks, and 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months. After 24 months, patients will continue to be followed at 3,4, 5 and 7 years. Design Techniques to Avoid Bias To eliminate selection bias, investigational and control comparison groups will be assigned at random. Institutional Review Board No clinical studies will begin without documented approval of the clinical investigation by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) affiliated with the study center.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
599
Cervical artificial disc mechanical device
Texas Back Institute-West
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Southern California Institute of Neurological Surgery
Escondido, California, United States
Massoudi & Jackson Neurosurgical Association
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Memorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group
Long Beach, California, United States
Eisenhower Medical Center
Rancho Mirage, California, United States
University of California- Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Spine Institute at St. John's Health Center
Santa Monica, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Care
Golden, Colorado, United States
Southeastern Clinical Research
Orlando, Florida, United States
...and 14 more locations
Composite Definition of Study Success
An individual subject in either treatment group was considered a success if the following criteria were met at 24 months: * Improvement in Neck Disability Index of at least 15/50 points in subjects with baseline Neck Disability Index scores of \>= 30/50 points, or a 50% improvement in subjects with a baseline Neck Disability Score score of \<30/50 where the Neck Disability Index is a measure designed to enable the physician to understand how much a subject's neck pain has affected his ability to manage everyday activities. * No study failures due to secondary surgical interventions at the index level * Absence of major complications defined as radiographic failure, neurologic failure, or failure by adverse event as adjudicated by the CEC
Time frame: 2 Years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.