Treatment studies have demonstrated that current smoking cessation techniques are less effective for women. The purpose of this study is to determine the role that gender plays in the effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy. In addition, the purpose of this study is to determine whether men and women differ in their response to smoking-related stimuli (e.g., taste or smell of a lit cigarette). Conclusions drawn from this study may help to improve cessation interventions for all smokers, particularly women.
Currently,about 70 percent of smokers who try to quit by using smoking cessation treatments are unsuccessful. Treatment studies have demonstrated that current smoking cessation techniques are less effective for women. There is no clear explanation for this difference, but it may involve a differential response to nicotine replacement treatments (NRTs) and/or smoking-related stimuli. For women, NRT may be less effective at suppressing withdrawal or blunting the effects of smoking during a quit attempt. Women may also be more sensitive to smoking-related stimuli, suc has the taste, sight, or smell of cigarette smoke. Tailoring treatments to the separate needs of smoker subgroups , such as men and women, my produce better cessation outcomes. The purpose of this study is to assess whether men and women differ in the their response to NRT (i.e., transdermal nicotine) and smoking-related stimuli. Participants in this double-blind, dose-comparison study will complete separate sessions in random order. Each session will last approximately 6.5 hours and will correspond to a transdermal patch dose (0 or 21mg) and cigarette type (denicotinized and nicotinized). Objectively verified cigarette abstinence will be required before each session. Sessions will occur at least 48 hours apart to avoid carryover. At the beginning of each session a patch will be placed on the participant's back and at 4, 5, and 6 hours after patch application the participant will smoke a cigarette (all identifying marking on the cigarette will be covered for blinding purposes). Physiological, subjective, cognitive, and smoking behavior outcomes will be collected during study visits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
21 mg nicotine transdermal system
Placebo nicotine patch
Nicotine containing cigarette
Virginia Commonwealth University - Clinical Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Subjective Effects
The full scale name is the "Urge to smoke" visual analog scale (VAS). It measures self-reported "urge to smoke". As with any VAS a word or phrase (in this case, "Urge to Smoke" is centered over a horizontal line anchored on the left by "not at all" and on the right by "extremely." In this study, participants used a mouse to produce a vertical mark on the horizontal line, and the score was the distance of the mark from the left anchor expressed as a percentage of total line length. Thus, the minimum was 0 ("not at all") and the maximum score was 100 ("extremely").
Time frame: 6 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
80
Non nicotine containing cigarette