The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
252
Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)
The non-parametric scale is constructed from 3 variables, modified after Cleland. Each patient receives a rank score from 1 to 246 (246-number of patients in the study). The lowest score receive patients who die (due to CV event), next patients still alive at end-of-study with the worst composite score, the best alive patients with 0 days in hospital and the largest improvement in the KCCQ (self-administered by patient symptom score, where the higher score reflect better health status). Scores will be summarized using non-parametric calculations. The mean of non-parametric scores is presented
Time frame: 9 months
Number of CV Deaths
Number of deaths
Time frame: 9 months
Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason
Each overnight stay is counted as one day. The lower the better
Time frame: 9 months
Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms
Changes from baseline in the symptom score subset (question 3, 5, 7 and 9) of KCCQ (swelling, fatigue, shortness of breath, shortness of breath night time). KCCQ is a self-administered by patient symptom score, where higher score reflect better health status. Scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100. This mean that the KCCQ scale is from 0 to 100 with the higher value showing a better health status.
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients
The 95% confidential interval (CI) is given as measure of dispersion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Alvesta, Sweden
Research Site
Arvika, Sweden
Research Site
Bjuv, Sweden
Research Site
Borensberg, Sweden
Research Site
Bromma, Sweden
Research Site
Dalby, Sweden
Research Site
Eskilstuna, Sweden
Research Site
Gagnef, Sweden
Research Site
Gothenburg, Sweden
Research Site
Hisings Kärra, Sweden
...and 29 more locations
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
Change range -100 to 100. The higher the better.
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Total Number of Titration Steps in Prescribed Heart Failure Treatment
Each titration step in prescribed medication is counted as one step, either up or down. One step up indicates an increase of dose in prescribed medication and one step down indicates a decrease of dose in prescribed medication. The sum of steps is given as a score. Score is given for each arm as a total number of titration steps for all patients in arm.
Time frame: 9 months
Discontinuations
Number of patients discontinued due to adverse events'
Time frame: 9 months