The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference between the result of treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis with two different shoulder prostheses.
In this randomized study, we wish to investigate with the use of clinical and radiological parameters whether there is a difference between the result of treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis with the Copeland resurfacing prosthesis and the Global CAP resurfacing prosthesis. Clinical parameters with the help of the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS): 1. Pain 2. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 3. Range of Motion (ROM) 4. Muscle strength Radiologic parameters: 1. Migration of resurfacing prostheses with use of MB-RSA 2. Bone density around the prosthesis measured with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) 3. Correlation between bone density and prosthesis migration
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
32
Both Copeland and Global Cap are uncemented prostheses with titanium-sprayed, hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated bone-contact surfaces.
Orthopaedic Department K, Silkeborg Hospital
Silkeborg, Denmark
Regionshospitalet Viborg
Viborg, Denmark
Migration of resurfacing prostheses
Time frame: five years
Bone density around the prosthesis
Time frame: five years
Pain
Time frame: five years
Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Time frame: five years
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time frame: five years
Muscle strength
Time frame: five years
Correlation between bone density and prosthesis migration
Time frame: five years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.