This study will examine whether Fx-1006A is effective in halting the progression of Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (FAP). Deposition of TTR amyloid is associated with a variety of human diseases. Deposition of amyloid fibrils of variant TTR (primarily V30M) in peripheral nerve tissue produces the condition called FAP. The prevention of the formation of amyloid by stabilization of the TTR native state should constitute an effective therapy for amyloid diseases. Therapeutic intervention with a TTR stabilizer drug, such as Fx-1006A, is hypothesized to stop progression of the disease in FAP patients. FAP is a uniformly fatal disease and Fx-1006A is intended to halt the relentless neurological deterioration FAP patients experience. This Phase 2/3 study will enroll early to mid-stage FAP patients in order to interrupt and stabilize the disease at a point in time where progression of motor and autonomic dysfunction can be maximally effected. Male and female patients with FAP with documented V30M TTR mutation will receive Fx-1006A or placebo once daily for a period of eighteen (18) months.
Deposition of TTR amyloid is associated with a variety of human diseases. Deposition of amyloid fibrils of variant TTR (primarily V30M) in peripheral nerve tissue produces the condition called FAP. The prevention of the formation of amyloid by stabilization of the TTR native state should constitute an effective therapy for amyloid diseases. Therapeutic intervention with a TTR stabilizer drug, such as Fx-1006A, is hypothesized to stop progression of the disease in FAP patients. FAP is a uniformly fatal disease and Fx-1006A is intended to halt the relentless neurological deterioration FAP patients experience. This Phase 2/3 study will enroll early to mid-stage FAP patients in order to interrupt and stabilize the disease at a point in time where progression of motor and autonomic dysfunction can be maximally effected. Male and female patients with FAP with documented V30M TTR mutation will receive Fx-1006A or placebo once daily for a period of eighteen (18) months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
128
MGH Neuropathy Laboratory
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
FLENI-Hepatology and Organ Transplant Dept.
Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hospital Universitário Prof. Clementino Fraga Filho-UFRJ
Rio de Janeiro, Southeast, Brazil
CHU de Bicetre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Île-de-France Region, France
Universitatsklinikum Munster, Transplant Hepatology
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Serviço de Neurologia-Hospital de Santa Maria
Lisbon, Lisbon District, Portugal
Unidade Clinica de Paramiloidose-Hospital Santo Antonio
Porto, Norte, Portugal
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Umea University Hospital
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
Kings College Hospital
London, London, United Kingdom
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 18
Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to less than\[\<\] 2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 18
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18
Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 18
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18
NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) are scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) were scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 6 and 12
Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to \<2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 6, 12
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 6 and 12
Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Domain Scores at Month 6, 12 and 18
Norfolk QOL-DN:35-item participant-rated questionnaire to assess impact of DN on QOL; Item 1-7:scored as 1=symptom present, 0=symptom absent. Item 8-35: scored on 5-point Likert scale: 0=no problem, 4=severe problem (except item 32: -2=much better, 0=about same, 2=much worse). Norfolk QOL-DN summarized in 5 domains(score range):physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy(-2 to 58), activities of daily living(ADLs) (0 to 20), symptoms(0 to 32), small fiber neuropathy(0 to 16), autonomic neuropathy(0 to 12); higher score=greater impairment, for each. Total score=-2 to138(higher score=worse QOL).
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Change From Baseline in Summated 7 Score for Large Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18
Summated 7 score: composite score included five Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) obtained in great toes, and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) value. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex and height. Total score range= -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Change From Baseline in Summated 3 Score for Small Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18
Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviates Score (NTSFnds) included cooling threshold for the lower limbs, heat pain threshold for the lower limbs and HRDB. Total score range= -11.2 to 11.2, where higher score=worse nerve function.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Change From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Month 6, 12 and 18
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared. mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels to compensate for edema formation associated with malnutrition. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Transthyretin (TTR) Tetramer
TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI.
Time frame: Week 8, Month 6, 12, 18
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.