Many heart failure patients are unable to reach target beta blocker doses. This study will address whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) will enable uptitration of beta-blockers to target doses and whether it will favorably affect remodeling by reducing left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), with measurable clinical benefit, beyond CRT alone (without changes in beta-blocker dose).
Beta blockers have been proven to have benefit in heart failure (HF) patients with regard to morbidity and mortality. However, initiation and uptitration remains a challenge in many patients. Worsening of heart failure, symptomatic hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia all limit up-titration to the target doses that have been shown to have mortality benefits (carvedilol \[Coreg\] 25 mg bid, metoprolol succinate \[Toprol-XL\] 200 mg qd) in the large clinical trials (COPERNICUS, MERIT-HF). It is debated whether the benefit of beta-blockade is solely due to heart rate reduction or more broadly from the cardiac, central and peripheral effects of blocking sympathetic activity. Clearly, there is a remodeling effect on the dilated ventricle. Furthermore, patients with heart rates of 64 bpm or less are rarely begun on beta-blocker therapy. It is not known whether these patients should be given a pacemaker in order to then safely initiate beta-blocker therapy. It is also clear that isolated right ventricular pacing can have deleterious effects on ventricular dyssynchrony and symptomatic heart failure despite medical therapy. Biventricular pacing (BIVPM), also known as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is the pacing mode of choice for patients with wide QRS complexes and symptomatic HF. It is hypothesized that CRT therapy allows for increased Beta -blocker dose (or initiation of beta-blocker in patients previously intolerant) with improved NYHA, ejection fraction, and remodeling effects. The synergy between two established heart failure therapies requires further evaluation in a prospective randomized trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2
Both groups get CRT. Group 1 is uptitrated to target dose beta blocker after CRT. Group 2 maintains their b-blocker dose from study entry.
Both arms
St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Jefferson Medical College
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
LVESVI change in patients with CRT/ increased dose of beta-blockers vs CRT and no change in beta-blocker dose.
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation of Optivol fluid measurement increases (decreased impedance) with symptomatic worsening of heart failure during beta blocker uptitration
Time frame: 6 months
Optivol measurements (decreased impedance, increase volume index) correlated with the need for adjusting diuretic therapy when uptitrating beta blocker dose
Time frame: 12 months
Functional improvements
Time frame: 6 months
Exercise - 6 minute walk
Time frame: 6 months
QOL - NYHA, Minnesota LWHFQ, Symptom Assessment Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Ejection fraction
Time frame: 6 months
LVEDVI
Time frame: 6 months
Remodeling
Time frame: 6 months
HF Hospitalizations/ Mortality
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of LVESVI in patients who actually achieve target dose
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison of LVESVI changes based on initial beta-blocker dose
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 6 months
Plasma Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) change
Time frame: 6 months
12 month comparison after Group 2 has been uptitrated.
Time frame: 12 months