Skin photoaging or skin photodamage were terms used to describe the change in the structure, function and appearance of skin caused by prolonged and repeated exposure to sunlight or other ultraviolet light sources. The visible effects of skin photodamage were fine lines, skin sagging, skin roughness, liver spots and also the appearance of red patches made up of thin red vessels (called telangiectasia). More and more people were presenting to doctors with concerns about skin photodamage and the demand for corrective procedures was increasing. Metvix photodynamic therapy (Metvix PDT) is a procedure currently marketed in several countries in Europe (including the United Kingdom \[UK\] and Spain) and in Australia, for the treatment of benign forms of skin cancer (example, actinic keratosis). The aim of the study was to assess whether Metvix PDT would be effective in correcting the effects related to photodamage and whether it would be well tolerated.
Different application times of the study treatment were being investigated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
32
Participants were treated with topical administration of Metvix cream.
Participants were treated with topical administration of Metvix Vehicle cream.
Policlinico Ruber
Madrid, Spain
Whittington Hospital
London, United Kingdom
University of Manchester-Hope Hospital
Manchester, United Kingdom
Number of Participants With Severity of Photodamage
Severity of cutaneous photodamage in participants were assessed using Griffiths photo numeric scale. The severity scores of photodamage on the scale ranged from 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), that is, no damage (0), mild damage (1-3), moderate damage (4-6), and severe damage (7-8) where the highest score indicated worst outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Severity of Mottled Hyper-Pigmentation
The evaluation of the severity of facial mottled hyperpigmentation were done using five-point scale. The score on the five-point scale ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), that is, 0 = none (no areas of mottled, irregular pigmentation), 1 = minimal (few, small lightly pigmented, discrete macules), 2 = mild (multiple, small lightly pigmented macules), 3 = moderate (widespread areas of mottled, moderately dark macules), 4 = severe (Widespread, multiple areas of dark macules/hyperpigmentation with uneven skin tone). The higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Severity of Fine Lines
The evaluation of the severity of facial fine lines were done using the five-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, that is, 0 = none- (lines disappear with stretching), 1 = minimal (few lines which do not completely disappear with stretching), 2 = mild (few lines which only diminish with stretching), 3 = moderate (widespread areas of lines which change minimally with stretching), 4 = severe- (widespread areas of lines which do not change at all with stretching), where the higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Severity of Telangiectasia
The severity of telangiectasia by using the scale ranging from 0 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), that is, 0 = absent (no telangiectasia), 1 = mild (slight telangiectasia characterized by appearance of a few fine, small red vessels \[0.2 millimeters \[mm\] or less in diameter); telangiectasia covers less than 10 percent (%) of the target area, 2 = moderate (pronounced telangiectasia characterized by appearance of several fine vessels and/or few large vessels \[0.2 mm or greater in diameter\]; telangiectasia covers between 10 to 30% of the target area), 3 = severe (severe telangiectasia characterized by the appearance of many fine vessels and/or large vessels; telangiectasia covers greater than 30% of the target area), where the higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Severity of Skin Roughness
The evaluation of the severity of skin roughness were done by using the five-point scale ranging from 0 to 4,that is, 0 = none ( very smooth, no patches of roughness), 1 = minimal (smooth with only a few patches of roughness), 2 = mild (mostly smooth with scattered patches of roughness), 3 = moderate (slightly rough with diffuse patches of roughness), 4 = severe (rough with diffuse areas of roughness, some scales may be visible), where the higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Severity of Skin Laxity
The evaluation of the severity of skin laxity were done by using the scale ranging from 0 to 3 that is, 0 = none (no skin laxity), 1 = mild (mild skin sagging), 2 = moderate (moderate skin sagging), 3 = severe (severe skin sagging), where the higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Tolerability Assessment of Erythema
Erythema was defined as an abnormal redness of the skin and was measured on the scale score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 3 (maximum) that is, 0 = none (no erythema),1 = mild (slight pinkness present), 2 = moderate (definite redness, easily recognized), and 3 = severe (intense redness), where the higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Tolerability Assessment of Edema
Abnormal tenseness of the skin was measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 3. 0 (none) no edema, 1 (mild) slight tenseness of skin without firmness, 2 (moderate) moderate tenseness of the skin with slight firmness, 3 (severe) severe tenseness of the skin with resistance to distortion. The higher score means the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Tolerability Assessment of Oozing/Crusting
Oozing/crusting was a continuing process of exudation of fluid from the lesions/formation of scab-like material on the surface of lesions resulting from dried serum. Oozing/crusting was assessed on a scale ranging from 0-3. 0 (none) no oozing/crusting, 1 (mild) faint sign of oozing and/or weeping; slight crusting on a few of the lesions, 2 (moderate) definite oozing, but not extensive (a few lesions/areas); definite crusting on several of the lesions, 3 (severe) marked oozing/weeping; heavy crusting on the majority of the lesions. The higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Participant's Skin Discomfort Score Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Participant skin discomfort was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 ("no skin discomfort") to 10 ("worst possible skin discomfort") evaluation of skin discomfort (including pain and itching) on each half-face was analyzed using a VAS. The higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 4
Participant's Skin Discomfort Score Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Participant skin discomfort was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 ("no skin discomfort") to 10 ("worst possible skin discomfort") evaluation of skin discomfort (including pain and itching) on each half-face was analyzed using a VAS. The higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 8
Number of Participants With Tolerability Assessment of Scaling
Abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum is measured on a scale 0 to 3. 0 (none) no scaling, 1 (mild) barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing, 2 (moderate) obvious but not profuse shedding, 3 (severe) heavy scale production. The higher score indicated the worse outcome.
Time frame: At Week 20
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Abnormalities presented at Baseline were considered AEs if they reoccurred after resolution or worsen during the AE collection period. Number of participants with AEs were reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 20
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.