This study was designed to test the efficacy, safety, tolerability and durability of the antiviral response between atazanavir (ATV) + ritonavir (/r) + abacavir/lamivudine(ABC/3TC) Fixed dose combination (FDC) each administered once daily (QD) for 36 weeks followed by randomization to either a simplification regimen of ATV or continuation of ATV +/r for an additional 48 weeks, each in combination with ABC/3TC in antiretroviral (ART)-naive, HIV-1 infected, HLA-B\*5701 negative subjects. All subjects who complete the 84-week study will be eligible to enter the treatment extension phase and continue for an additional 60 weeks. The purpose of this extension is to obtain longer term treatment data in subjects who have completed the 84-week study.
Safety and Efficacy of an Initial Regimen of Atazanavir (ATV) + Ritonavir (/r) + the Abacavir/Lamivudine Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet (ABC/3TC FDC) for 36 weeks followed by Simplification to Atazanavir with ABC/3TC FDC or Maintenance of the Initial Regimen for an Additional 48 weeks in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1 Infected HLA-B\*5701 Negative Subjects followed by an Optional 60-Week Treatment Extension Phase
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
515
Abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC) FDC + atazanavir (ATV)+ ritoanvir (/r) for 36weeks followed by ABC/3TC + ATV + /r for 48wks followed by optional treatment extension for 60 weeks on the same regimen
Abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC) FDC + atazanavir (ATV) + ritonavir (/r) for 36 weeks followed by ABC/3TC + ATV for 48wks followed by optional treatment extension for 60 weeks on the same regimen
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, United States
Percentage of Participants (PAR) Who Achieved Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies (c) /Milliliter (ml) at the Week 84 Visit
The percentage of PAR with HIV-1 RNA virus \<50 c/ml determined from a blood sample drawn at Week 84 was tabulated by treatment arm with stratification by baseline HIV-1 RNA (\<100,000 c/ml and \>=100,000 c/ml). Per TLOVR algorithm, responders were PAR with confirmed viral load \<50 c/ml who had not met any non-responder criterion. Non-responders were PAR who never achieved confirmed HIV RNA \<50 c/ml, prematurely discontinued study or study medication for any reason, had confirmed rebound to at least 50 c/ml, or had an unconfirmed HIV RNA of at least 50 c/ml at last visit.
Time frame: Week 84
Mean Age at Baseline of Participants Randomized to Treatment for the 48-Week Randomized Phase
The mean age of participants randomized to treatment in the Randomized Phase was calculated at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline of Randomized Phase
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/ml at the Week 36 Visit
The percentage of PAR with HIV-1 RNA virus \<50 c/ml from a Week 36 blood sample was tabulated. Per TLOVR algorithm, responders were PAR with confirmed viral load \<50 c/ml who had not met any non-responder criterion. Non-responders were PAR who never achieved confirmed HIV RNA \<50 c/ml, prematurely discontinued (DC) study or study medication (any reason), had confirmed rebound to \>=50 c/ml, or had an unconfirmed HIV RNA \>=50 c/ml at last visit. ITT-E observed analysis (Obs): all observed data. ITT-E M/D=F analysis: PAR with missing data/data collected after study medication DC were failures.
Time frame: Week 36
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/ml at the Week 84 Visit
A blood sample was drawn to determine the amount of HIV-1 RNA virus in c/ml at Week 84. The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/ml at Week 84 was tabulated. The secondary analysis methods were: Observed (Obs; uses all visits with data in the analysis period), and missing/discontinuation=failure (M/D=F) analyses. M/D=F: participants with missing data or data collected after study medication DC were considered failures.
Time frame: Week 84
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/ml at the Week 144 Visit
Percentage of PAR with HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/ml at Week 144 was tabulated; stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (\<100,000 and \>=100,000 c/ml). Per TLOVR algorithm, responders were PAR with confirmed (CF) HIV RNA \<50 c/ml who had not met any non-responder (NR) criterion. NR were PAR who never achieved CF HIV RNA \<50 c/ml, prematurely discontinued (DC) study or study medication (Med), had CF rebound to \>=50 c/ml, or had an unconfirmed HIV RNA \>=50 c/ml at last visit. Observed analysis (Obs): all observed data. M/D=F analysis: PAR with missing data/data collected after study Med DC were failures.
Time frame: Week 144
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 c/ml at the Week 36 Visit
The percentage of PAR with HIV-1 RNA virus \<400 c/ml from a Week 36 blood sample was tabulated. Per TLOVR algorithm, responders were PAR with confirmed (CF) HIV RNA \<400 c/ml who had not met any non-responder criterion. Non-responders were PAR who never achieved CF HIV RNA \<400 c/ml, prematurely discontinued (DC) study or study medication (Med; any reason), had CF rebound to \>=400 c/ml, or had an unconfirmed HIV RNA \>=400 c/ml at last visit. ITT-E observed analysis (Obs): all observed data. ITT-E M/D=F analysis: PAR with missing data/data collected after study Med DC were failures.
Time frame: Week 36
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 c/ml at the Week 84 Visit
Percentage of PAR with HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/ml at Week 84 was tabulated; stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (\<100,000 and \>=100,000 c/ml). Per TLOVR algorithm, responders were PAR with confirmed (CF) HIV-RNA \<400 c/ml who had not met any non-responder (NR) criterion. NR were PAR who never achieved CF HIV RNA \<400 c/ml, prematurely discontinued (DC) study or study medication (Med), had CF rebound to \>=400 c/ml, or had an unconfirmed HIV RNA \>=400 c/ml at last visit. Observed analysis (Obs): all observed data. M/D=F analysis: PAR with missing data/data collected after study Med DC were failures.
Time frame: Week 84
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 c/ml at the Week 144 Visit
Percentage of PAR with HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/ml at Week 144 was tabulated; stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA (\<100,000 and \>=100,000 c/ml). Per TLOVR algorithm, responders were PAR with confirmed (CF) HIV-RNA \<400 c/ml who had not met any non-responder (NR) criterion. NR were PAR who never achieved CF HIV RNA \<400 c/ml, prematurely discontinued (DC) study or study medication (Med), had CF rebound to \>=400 c/ml, or had an unconfirmed HIV RNA \>=400 c/ml at last visit. Observed analysis (Obs): all observed data. M/D=F analysis: PAR with missing data/data collected after study Med DC were failures.
Time frame: Week 144
Number of Participants Who Met the Protocol-defined Virologic Failure (PDVF) Criteria at Week 36
The number of participants that failed to respond to therapy through 36 weeks on treatment, based on the protocol definition of virologic failure (PDVF), was tabulated. PDVF was defined as (a) failure to achieve plasma HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/ml by Week 30 or (b) confirmed HIV-1 RNA rebound \>=400 c/ml after achieving HIV-1 \<400 c/ml.
Time frame: Week 36
Number of Participants Who Met the PDVF Criteria at Week 84
The number of participants that failed to respond to therapy from the time of treatment randomization through Week 84, based on the protocol definition of virologic failure (PDVF), was tabulated. PDVF was defined as (a) failure to achieve plasma HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/ml by Week 30 or (b) confirmed HIV-1 RNA rebound \>=400 c/ml after achieving HIV-1 \<400 c/ml.
Time frame: Week 84
Number of Participants Who Met the PDVF Criteria at Week 144
The number of participants enrolled in the extension phase that failed to respond to therapy from Week 84 through Week 144, based on the protocol definition of virologic failure (PDVF) was tabulated,. PDVF was defined as (a) failure to achieve plasma HIV-1 RNA \<400 c/ml by Week 30 or (b) confirmed HIV-1 RNA rebound \>=400 c/ml after achieving HIV-1 \<400 c/ml.
Time frame: Week 144
Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA at Week 36
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 36 value minus the baseline value. Blood was drawn to analyze for plasma HIV viral load.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA at Week 84
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 84 value minus the baseline value. Blood was drawn to analyze for plasma HIV viral load.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 84
Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA at Week 144
Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 144 value minus the baseline value. Blood was drawn to analyze for plasma HIV viral load.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 144
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 36
Blood was drawn to analyze for CD4+ cell count. A CD4+ cell is a T lymphocyte that carries the CD4 antigen. Immunologic response was assessed by CD4+ counts. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 36 value minus the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 84
A CD4+ cell is a T lymphocyte that carries the CD4 antigen. Immunologic response was assessed by CD4+ counts. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 84 value minus the baseline value. Blood was drawn to analyze for CD4+ cell count.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 84
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 144
A CD4+ cell is a T lymphocyte that carries the CD4 antigen. Immunologic response was assessed by CD4+ counts. Change from baseline was calculated as the Week 144 value minus the baseline value. Blood was drawn to analyze for CD4+ cell count.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 144
Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants With Treatment-emergent HIV Genotypic Resistance in Reverse Transcriptase and Protease From Baseline Through Week 36
A blood sample was drawn for participants failing to respond to therapy, and the mutations present in the virus were identified. For each participant, the mutations found at the time of failure were compared with any mutations found in the blood sample at baseline. New resistance-associated mutations (defined by the International AIDS Society-USA guidelines) that developed at the time of failure were tabulated by drug class. PAR, participants; VF, virologic failure; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants With Treatment-emergent HIV Genotypic Resistance in Reverse Transcriptase and Protease From Randomization at Week 36 Through Week 84
A blood sample was drawn for participants failing to respond to therapy, and the mutations present in the virus were identified. For each participant, the mutations found at the time of failure were compared with any mutations found in the blood sample at baseline. New International AIDs Society-USA defined resistance mutations that developed at the time of failure were tabulated by drug class. VF, virologic failure; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor.
Time frame: Randomization at Week 36 through Week 84
Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants With Treatment-emergent HIV Genotypic Resistance in Reverse Transcriptase and Protease From Week 84 Through Week 144
A blood sample was drawn for participants failing to respond to therapy, and the mutations present in the virus were identified. For each participant, the mutations found at the time of failure were compared with any mutations found in the blood sample at baseline. New International AIDs Society-USA defined resistance mutations that developed at the time of failure were tabulated by drug class. VF, virologic failure; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor.
Time frame: Week 84 through Week 144
Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants From Baseline Through Week 36 With Treatment-emergent Reductions in Susceptibility to Abacavir, Lamivudine, Atazanavir, or Ritonavir
A blood sample was drawn for participants failing to respond to therapy, and changes in drug susceptibility for HIV isolated from the participants for each drug used in the study were assessed. For each participant, the changes in drug susceptibility detected by phenotypic assay in virus from the sample collected at the time of failure was compared with drug susceptibility in the virus from the blood sample at baseline. PAR, participant.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 36
Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants From Randomization at Week 36 Through Week 84 With Treatment-emergent Reductions in HIV Susceptibility to Abacavir, Lamivudine, Atazanavir, or Ritonavir
A blood sample was drawn for participants failing to respond to therapy, and changes in drug susceptibility for HIV isolated from the participants for each drug used in the study were assessed. For each participant, the changes in drug susceptibility detected by phenotypic assay in virus from the sample collected at the time of failure was compared with drug susceptibility in the virus from the blood sample at baseline. PAR, participant.
Time frame: Randomization at Week 36 through Week 84
Number of Confirmed Virologic Failure Participants From Week 84 Through Week 144 With Treatment-emergent Reductions in HIV Susceptibility to Abacavir, Lamivudine, Atazanavir, or Ritonavir
A blood sample was drawn for participants failing to respond to therapy, and changes in drug susceptibility for HIV isolated from the participants for each drug used in the study were assessed. For each participant, the changes in drug susceptibility detected by phenotypic assay in virus from the sample collected at the time of failure was compared with drug susceptibility in the virus from the blood sample at baseline. PAR, participant.
Time frame: Week 84 through Week 144
Mean Percent Compliance at Week 36
Percent compliance is defined as the total number of pills taken divided by the total number of pills prescribed. The total number of pills taken was calculated by subtracting any returned pills from the total number of pills that were dispensed to each participant during this period. Compliance was calculated for each medication in the regimen.
Time frame: Week 36
Mean Percent Compliance at Week 84
Percent compliance is defined as the total number of pills taken divided by the total number of pills prescribed. The total number of pills taken was calculated by subtracting any returned pills from the total number of pills that were dispensed to each participant during this period. Compliance was calculated for each medication in the regimen.
Time frame: Week 84
Mean Percent Compliance at Week 144
Percent compliance is defined as the total number of pills taken divided by the total number of pills prescribed. The total number of pills taken was calculated by subtracting any returned pills from the total number of pills that were dispensed to each participant during this period. Compliance was calculated for each medication in the regimen.
Time frame: Week 144
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
GSK Investigational Site
Oakland, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
...and 62 more locations